Orla McBride
Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4
McBride, Orla; Butter, Sarah; Murphy, Jamie; Shevlin, Mark; Hartman, Todd K.; Bennett, Kate M.; Stocks, Thomas V.A.; Lloyd, Alex; McKay, Ryan; Gibson-Miller, Jilly; Levita, Liat; Mason, Liam; Martinez, Anton P.; Hyland, Philip; Valli�res, Fr�d�rique; Karatzias, Thanos; Valiente, Carmen; Vazquez, Carmelo; Bentall, Richard P.
Authors
Sarah Butter
Jamie Murphy
Mark Shevlin
Todd K. Hartman
Kate M. Bennett
Thomas V.A. Stocks
Alex Lloyd
Ryan McKay
Jilly Gibson-Miller
Liat Levita
Liam Mason
Anton P. Martinez
Philip Hyland
Fr�d�rique Valli�res
Prof Thanos Karatzias T.Karatzias@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Carmen Valiente
Carmelo Vazquez
Richard P. Bentall
Abstract
Objectives: This paper outlines fieldwork procedures for Wave 4 of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study in the UK during November-December 2020. Methods: Respondents provided data on socio-political attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours, and mental health disorders (anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress). In Phase 1, adults (N=2878) were reinvited to participate. At Phase 2, new recruitment: (i) replenished the longitudinal strand to account for attrition; and (ii) oversampled from the devolved UK nations to facilitate robust between-country analyses for core study outcomes. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the longitudinal panel was representative of the baseline sample characteristics. Results: In Phase 1, 1796 adults were successfully recontacted and provided full interviews at Wave 4 (62.4% retention rate). In Phase 2, 292 new respondents were recruited to replenish the panel, as well as 1779 adults from Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, who were representative of the socio-political composition of the adult populations in these nations. The raking procedure successfully re-balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1% of population estimates for selected socio-demographic characteristics. Conclusion: The C19PRC Study offers a unique opportunity to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research addressing important public health questions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Citation
McBride, O., Butter, S., Murphy, J., Shevlin, M., Hartman, T. K., Bennett, K. M., Stocks, T. V., Lloyd, A., McKay, R., Gibson-Miller, J., Levita, L., Mason, L., Martinez, A. P., Hyland, P., Vallières, F., Karatzias, T., Valiente, C., Vazquez, C., & Bentall, R. P. (2022). Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 31(1), Article e1899. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1899
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 22, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 5, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2022-03 |
Deposit Date | Oct 25, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 5, 2021 |
Print ISSN | 1049-8931 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 31 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | e1899 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1899 |
Keywords | COVID-19; psychological; general population; longitudinal; survey methodology |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2816186 |
Files
Design, Content, And Fieldwork Procedures Of The COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 (supplementary material)
(91 Kb)
Document
Design, Content, And Fieldwork Procedures Of The COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4Design, Content, And Fieldwork Procedures Of The COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 (supplementary resul
(43 Kb)
Document
Design, Content, And Fieldwork Procedures Of The COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4 (figures)
(166 Kb)
Document
Design, Content, And Fieldwork Procedures Of The COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study – Wave 4
(584 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
The health role of local area coordinators in Scotland: A mixed methods study.
(2013)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search