A. M. Nevill
Optimal power-to-mass ratios when predicting flat and hill-climbing time-trial cycling
Nevill, A. M.; Jobson, S. A.; Davison, R. C. R.; Jeukendrup, A. E.
Authors
S. A. Jobson
R. C. R. Davison
A. E. Jeukendrup
Abstract
The purpose of this article was to establish whether previously reported oxygen-to-mass ratios, used to predict flat and hill-climbing cycling performance, extend to similar power-to-mass ratios incorporating other, often quick and convenient measures of power output recorded in the laboratory [maximum aerobic power (W MAP), power output at ventilatory threshold (W VT) and average power output (W AVG) maintained during a 1 h performance test]. A proportional allometric model was used to predict the optimal power-to-mass ratios associated with cycling speeds during flat and hill-climbing cycling. The optimal models predicting flat time-trial cycling speeds were found to be (W MAP m −0.48)0.54, (W VT m −0.48)0.46 and (W AVG m −0.34)0.58 that explained 69.3, 59.1 and 96.3% of the variance in cycling speeds, respectively. Cross-validation results suggest that, in conjunction with body mass, W MAP can provide an accurate and independent prediction of time-trial cycling, explaining 94.6% of the variance in cycling speeds with the standard deviation about the regression line, s=0.686 km h−1. Based on these models, there is evidence to support that previously reported -to-mass ratios associated with flat cycling speed extend to other laboratory-recorded measures of power output (i.e. Wm −0.32). However, the power-function exponents (0.54, 0.46 and 0.58) would appear to conflict with the assumption that the cyclists’ speeds should be proportional to the cube root (0.33) of power demand/expended, a finding that could be explained by other confounding variables such as bicycle geometry, tractional resistance and/or the presence of a tailwind. The models predicting 6 and 12% hill-climbing cycling speeds were found to be proportional to (W MAP m −0.91)0.66, revealing a mass exponent, 0.91, that also supports previous research.
Citation
Nevill, A. M., Jobson, S. A., Davison, R. C. R., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2006). Optimal power-to-mass ratios when predicting flat and hill-climbing time-trial cycling. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 97(4), 424-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-006-0189-6
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 17, 2006 |
Online Publication Date | May 10, 2006 |
Publication Date | 2006-07 |
Deposit Date | Jun 13, 2008 |
Journal | European Journal of Applied Physiology |
Print ISSN | 1439-6319 |
Electronic ISSN | 1439-6327 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 97 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 424-431 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-006-0189-6 |
Keywords | Power supply and demand; Cycling speed; Maximal aerobic power, Power at ventilatory threshold, Average power output |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/1634 |
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search