What's in a name? Concordance is better than adherence for promoting partnership and self-management of chronic disease.

Randall, Sue; Neubeck, Lis

Abstract

The choice of language health professionals use to discuss self-management of chronic disease is important and influences patients’ self-management. The words compliance, adherence and concordance are used to discuss patients’ agreement with prescribed treatment plans, but have different tone and meanings. Models of care linked to the words compliance and adherence are underpinned by interactions between patients and healthcare providers that merely reinforce instructions about treatments. The ‘patient-professional partnership’ is introduced as a model by Bodenheimer et al. (2002, p. 2469) whereby true partnership working should be an opportunity to pool the expertise of both parties to arrive at mutually agreed goals in concordance. The impact these words might have on partnership working is important in defining the patient–health professional relationship, and for the patients’ healthcare outcomes and the potential effect on healthcare utilisation.

Citation

Randall, S., & Neubeck, L. (2016). What's in a name? Concordance is better than adherence for promoting partnership and self-management of chronic disease. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 22(3), 181-184. https://doi.org/10.1071/py15140

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Nov 25, 2015
• Online Publication Date: May 6, 2016
• Publication Date: May 6, 2016
• Deposit Date: Oct 26, 2016
• Journal: Australian Journal of Primary Health
• Print ISSN: 1448-7527
• Electronic ISSN: 1836-7399
• Publisher: CSIRO Publishing
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 22
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 181-184
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/py15140
• Keywords: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Health Policy
• Public URL: http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/408249