Shahzad Gani
Editorial: The shadowlands of (geo)science communication in academia – definitions, problems, and possible solutions
Gani, Shahzad; Arnal, Louise; Beattie, Lucy; Hillier, John; Illingworth, Sam; Lanza, Tiziana; Mohadjer, Solmaz; Pulkkinen, Karoliina; Roop, Heidi; Stewart, Iain; von Elverfeldt, Kirsten; Zihms, Stephanie
Authors
Louise Arnal
Lucy Beattie
John Hillier
Prof Sam Illingworth S.Illingworth@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Tiziana Lanza
Solmaz Mohadjer
Karoliina Pulkkinen
Heidi Roop
Iain Stewart
Kirsten von Elverfeldt
Stephanie Zihms
Abstract
Science communication is an important part of research, including in the geosciences, as it can (1) benefit both society and science and (2) make science more publicly accountable. However, much of this work takes place in “shadowlands” that are neither fully seen nor understood. These shadowlands are spaces, aspects, and practices of science communication that are not clearly defined and may be harmful with respect to the science being communicated or for the science communicators themselves. With the increasing expectation in academia that researchers should participate in science communication, there is a need to address some of the major issues that lurk in these shadowlands. Here, the editorial team of Geoscience Communication seeks to shine a light on the shadowlands of geoscience communication by geoscientists in academia and suggest some solutions and examples of effective practice. The issues broadly fall under three categories: (1) harmful or unclear objectives, (2) poor quality and lack of rigor, and (3) exploitation of science communicators working within academia. Ameliorating these problems will require the following action: (1) clarifying objectives and audiences, (2) adequately training science communicators, and (3) giving science communication equivalent recognition to other professional activities. In this editorial, our aim is to cultivate a more transparent and responsible landscape for geoscience communication – a transformation that will ultimately benefit the progress of science; the welfare of scientists; and, more broadly, society at large.
Citation
Gani, S., Arnal, L., Beattie, L., Hillier, J., Illingworth, S., Lanza, T., Mohadjer, S., Pulkkinen, K., Roop, H., Stewart, I., von Elverfeldt, K., & Zihms, S. (2024). Editorial: The shadowlands of (geo)science communication in academia – definitions, problems, and possible solutions. Geoscience Communication, 7(4), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024
Journal Article Type | Editorial |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 26, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Nov 12, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2024 |
Deposit Date | Nov 18, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 18, 2024 |
Journal | Geoscience Communication |
Publisher | European Geosciences Union |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 7 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 251-266 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024 |
Files
Editorial: The shadowlands of (geo)science communication in academia – definitions, problems, and possible solutions
(2.1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
A collaborative adaptation game for promoting climate action: Minions of Disruptions™
(2024)
Journal Article
Poetry and Pedagogy in Higher Education
(2024)
Book
Why role-playing games can spur climate action
(2024)
Journal Article
Generative AI in academia: Friend or foe?
(2024)
Digital Artefact
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search