Jennifer McIntosh
A case study of polypharmacy management in nine European countries: Implications for change management and implementation
McIntosh, Jennifer; Alonso, Albert; MacLure, Katie; Stewart, Derek; Kempen, Thomas; Mair, Alpana; Castel-Branco, Margarida; Codina, Carles; Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando; Fleming, Glenda; Gennimata, Dimitra; Gillespie, Ulrika; Harrison, Cathy; Illario, Maddalena; Junius-Walker, Ulrike; Kampolis, Christos F.; Kardas, Przemyslaw; Lewek, Pawel; Malva, Jo�o; Menditto, Enrica; Scullin, Claire; Wiese, Birgitt; on behalf of the SIMPATHY Consortium
Authors
Albert Alonso
Katie MacLure
Derek Stewart
Thomas Kempen
Dr Alpana Mair A.Mair@napier.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Margarida Castel-Branco
Carles Codina
Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Glenda Fleming
Dimitra Gennimata
Ulrika Gillespie
Cathy Harrison
Maddalena Illario
Ulrike Junius-Walker
Christos F. Kampolis
Przemyslaw Kardas
Pawel Lewek
Jo�o Malva
Enrica Menditto
Claire Scullin
Birgitt Wiese
on behalf of the SIMPATHY Consortium
Abstract
Background
Multimorbidity and its associated polypharmacy contribute to an increase in adverse drug events, hospitalizations, and healthcare spending. This study aimed to address: what exists regarding polypharmacy management in the European Union (EU); why programs were, or were not, developed; and, how identified initiatives were developed, implemented, and sustained.
Methods
Change management principles (Kotter) and normalization process theory (NPT) informed data collection and analysis. Nine case studies were conducted in eight EU countries: Germany (Lower Saxony), Greece, Italy (Campania), Poland, Portugal, Spain (Catalonia), Sweden (Uppsala), and the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland and Scotland). The workflow included a review of country/region specific polypharmacy policies, key informant interviews with stakeholders involved in policy development and implementation and, focus groups of clinicians and managers. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis of individual cases and framework analysis across cases.
Results
Polypharmacy initiatives were identified in five regions (Catalonia, Lower Saxony, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Uppsala) and included all care settings. There was agreement, even in cases without initiatives, that polypharmacy is a significant issue to address. Common themes regarding the development and implementation of polypharmacy management initiatives were: locally adapted solutions, organizational culture supporting innovation and teamwork, adequate workforce training, multidisciplinary teams, changes in workflow, redefinition of roles and responsibilities of professionals, policies and legislation supporting the initiative, and data management and information and communication systems to assist development and implementation. Depending on the setting, these were considered either facilitators or barriers to implementation.
Conclusion
Within the studied EU countries, polypharmacy management was not widely addressed. These results highlight the importance of change management and theory-based implementation strategies, and provide examples of polypharmacy management initiatives that can assist managers and policymakers in developing new programs or scaling up existing ones, particularly in places currently lacking such initiatives.
Citation
McIntosh, J., Alonso, A., MacLure, K., Stewart, D., Kempen, T., Mair, A., Castel-Branco, M., Codina, C., Fernandez-Llimos, F., Fleming, G., Gennimata, D., Gillespie, U., Harrison, C., Illario, M., Junius-Walker, U., Kampolis, C. F., Kardas, P., Lewek, P., Malva, J., Menditto, E., …on behalf of the SIMPATHY Consortium. (2018). A case study of polypharmacy management in nine European countries: Implications for change management and implementation. PLOS ONE, 13(4), Article e0195232. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195232
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 8, 2018 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 18, 2018 |
Publication Date | Apr 18, 2018 |
Deposit Date | May 4, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | May 4, 2021 |
Journal | PLOS ONE |
Print ISSN | 1932-6203 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Issue | 4 |
Article Number | e0195232 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195232 |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2768751 |
Files
A Case Study Of Polypharmacy Management In Nine European Countries: Implications For Change Management And Implementation
(2.5 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2018 McIntosh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
You might also like
Polypharmacy and Integrated Care
(2021)
Book Chapter
Appropriate polypharmacy: a barometer for integrated care
(2020)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search