John Cowan
Breaking the Rules: writing reflectively for yourself.
Cowan, John
Authors
Contributors
Nathan L Mertens
Editor
Abstract
The rules which epitomise good writing may on occasions be broken, deliberately and with what the writers judge to be good purpose. This can well occur when students or staff set out to engage effectively with their personal and professional development, through personal reflection on and in experiences. They may do this in what has been called “stream of consciousness” writing, which is deliberately compiled in a manner at variance with the general rules for best practice. The rationale for such an unusual decision, namely to engage in what is frankly disorderly writing, is set out briefly in this chapter. Its characteristics are summarised, in implicit contrast with more conventional styles of writing. Examples are included of claims for the effectiveness of this style when used for developmental purposes by students and staff; and reference is made to the publications of some of those who have endorsed this approach.
Citation
Cowan, J. (2009). Breaking the Rules: writing reflectively for yourself. In N. L. Mertens (Ed.), Writing, Processes, Tools and Techniques (109-113). Nova Science Publishers
Publication Date | 2009 |
---|---|
Deposit Date | Sep 7, 2012 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 7, 2012 |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Pages | 109-113 |
Book Title | Writing, Processes, Tools and Techniques |
ISBN | 978-1616689162 |
Keywords | Professional development; reflective writing; "stream of consciousness"; |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/5617 |
Contract Date | Sep 7, 2012 |
Files
Breaking_the_rules_6docx.doc
(55 Kb)
Document
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
The learner’s role in assessing higher level abilities
(2012)
Journal Article
Public feedback - but personal feedforward?
(2012)
Journal Article
Students’ choices between typing and handwriting in examinations.
(2012)
Journal Article
Choices of approaches in e-moderation: conclusions from a grounded theory study
(2010)
Journal Article
Peer choice - does reviewer self-selection work?
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search