Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Euro Petition

People Involved

Project Description

The EuroPetition project piloted the implementation of a trans-European Local Authority service providing distributed citizen engagement and interaction with the European Parliament’s PETI Petitions Committee and the European Citizens' Initiative. The EuroPetition project is sponsored by the European Commission under EU eParticipation preparatory action.
The open-source e-petitioner system was developed by Public-i from ITC's original system. The system supports coordination and submission of cross-border and pan-European EuroPetitions to local government and the European Parliament's Petition Committee. Five European regions were involved: Andalusia (Spain), Italy, Netherlands, Sweden and the UK and with a reach of around 6 million citizens across the EU. It showed how to strengthen and broaden citizens' participation in democratic decision-making and contribute to better legislation through applying the latest available innovative ICT. 

Edinburgh Napier designed and implemented the project evaluation. (More about the evaluation).  The evaluation concluded that the EuroPetition project had met and often exceeded its objectives. It demonstrated that it is possible to promote the concept of e-petitions to widen and further understand citizen participation in contexts such as Spain where the petitioning concept is new. It has also demonstrated the proof of concept of a pan-European multilingual e-petitioning eParticipation service which can help citizens forge connections with the European Parliament, reducing the democratic deficit across the EU.

EuroPetition can help the European Parliament Petitions Committee to reduce their workload by preventing the submission of invalid petitions and taking advantage of local government to support the petitioning process. At the same time the process can support subsidiarity, increase transparency and citizen engagement. However, this can only happen if the Petitions Committee (ie the MEPs and the Secretariat) takes ownership of the process (and ensures provision of local support), and recognises the gains that it can make by proactively engaging with the petitioners at the beginning of the petition cycle to ensure that concerned citizens the petitions that it does have to formally respond to are within scope and clearly worded. The Scottish and German Parliaments have shown that this can be done without restricting the citizen’s ultimate right to petition.

The positive engagement with defining data standards for e-petitions and the process of defining the ECI presents an opportunity for the EuroPetition service, as it could be adapted to support the ECI process with relatively minor modifications. 


Government Computing interview: Peter Cruickshank emphasises the need for human support for e-petitioners.

Status Project Complete
Funder(s) European Commission
Value £54,749.00
Project Dates Feb 1, 2009 - Jan 31, 2011



You might also like

e-Placement Scotland Nov 1, 2010 - Jul 31, 2022
Between 2010 and 2014, e-Placement Scotland worked with industry to create over 800 paid placements for students in Scotland’s universities and colleges. The project team disseminated widely to both education and business sectors in order to maximise... Read More about e-Placement Scotland.

iDTV May 23, 2005 - Feb 28, 2008
A Scottish pilot to test the potential of iDTV as a medium for providing public sector information and delivering public services was launched on 7th September 2004. The pilot ran for 6 months and involved collaboration between the Scottish Executive... Read More about iDTV.

Can pay, should pay? a comparison of outcomes for paid and unpaid work opportunities for employers and students. Oct 1, 2012 - Jan 4, 2013
We have published the following papers:
 
Smith, C., Smith, S., Irving, C. 2013 Can pay? Should pay? A comparison of outcomes for paid and unpaid work opportunities for employers and students, HEA STEM: Annual Learning and Teaching... Read More about Can pay, should pay? a comparison of outcomes for paid and unpaid work opportunities for employers and students..