Sarah S. Richtering
Examination of an eHealth literacy scale and a health literacy scale in a population with moderate to high cardiovascular risk: Rasch analyses
Richtering, Sarah S.; Morris, Rebecca; Soh, Sze-Ee; Barker, Anna; Bampi, Fiona; Neubeck, Lis; Coorey, Genevieve; Mulley, John; Chalmers, John; Usherwood, Tim; Peiris, David; Chow, Clara K.; Redfern, Julie
Authors
Rebecca Morris
Sze-Ee Soh
Anna Barker
Fiona Bampi
Prof Lis Neubeck L.Neubeck@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Genevieve Coorey
John Mulley
John Chalmers
Tim Usherwood
David Peiris
Clara K. Chow
Julie Redfern
Abstract
Introduction
Electronic health (eHealth) strategies are evolving making it important to have valid scales to assess eHealth and health literacy. Item response theory methods, such as the Rasch measurement model, are increasingly used for the psychometric evaluation of scales. This paper aims to examine the internal construct validity of an eHealth and health literacy scale using Rasch analysis in a population with moderate to high cardiovascular disease risk.
Methods
The first 397 participants of the CONNECT study completed the electronic health Literacy Scale (eHEALS) and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Overall Rasch model fit as well as five key psychometric properties were analysed: unidimensionality, response thresh-
olds, targeting, differential item functioning and internal consistency.
Results
The eHEALS had good overall model fit (χ2 = 54.8, p = 0.06), ordered response thresholds, reasonable targeting and good internal consistency (person separation index (PSI) 0.90). It did, however, appear to measure two constructs of eHealth literacy. The HLQ subscales (except subscale 5) did not fit the Rasch model (χ2: 18.18–60.60, p: 0.00–0.58) and had sub-optimal targeting for most subscales. Subscales 6 to 9 displayed disordered thresholds indi-cating participants had difficulty distinguishing between response options. All subscales did, nonetheless, demonstrate moderate to good internal consistency (PSI: 0.62–0.82).
Citation
Richtering, S. S., Morris, R., Soh, S.-E., Barker, A., Bampi, F., Neubeck, L., Coorey, G., Mulley, J., Chalmers, J., Usherwood, T., Peiris, D., Chow, C. K., & Redfern, J. (2017). Examination of an eHealth literacy scale and a health literacy scale in a population with moderate to high cardiovascular risk: Rasch analyses. PLOS ONE, 12(4), Article e0175372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175372
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 6, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 27, 2017 |
Publication Date | Apr 27, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Apr 28, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 28, 2017 |
Journal | PLOS ONE |
Print ISSN | 1932-6203 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 12 |
Issue | 4 |
Article Number | e0175372 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175372 |
Keywords | Electronic health, eHealth, health literacy, cardiovascular disease, |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/834599 |
Contract Date | Apr 28, 2017 |
Files
Examination of an EHealth literacy scale and a health literacy scale in a population with moderate to high cardiovascular risk: Rasch analysis
(1.3 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2017 Richtering et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search