Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Examination of an eHealth literacy scale and a health literacy scale in a population with moderate to high cardiovascular risk: Rasch analyses

Richtering, Sarah S.; Morris, Rebecca; Soh, Sze-Ee; Barker, Anna; Bampi, Fiona; Neubeck, Lis; Coorey, Genevieve; Mulley, John; Chalmers, John; Usherwood, Tim; Peiris, David; Chow, Clara K.; Redfern, Julie

Authors

Sarah S. Richtering

Rebecca Morris

Sze-Ee Soh

Anna Barker

Fiona Bampi

Genevieve Coorey

John Mulley

John Chalmers

Tim Usherwood

David Peiris

Clara K. Chow

Julie Redfern



Abstract

Introduction
Electronic health (eHealth) strategies are evolving making it important to have valid scales to assess eHealth and health literacy. Item response theory methods, such as the Rasch measurement model, are increasingly used for the psychometric evaluation of scales. This paper aims to examine the internal construct validity of an eHealth and health literacy scale using Rasch analysis in a population with moderate to high cardiovascular disease risk.
Methods
The first 397 participants of the CONNECT study completed the electronic health Literacy Scale (eHEALS) and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Overall Rasch model fit as well as five key psychometric properties were analysed: unidimensionality, response thresh-
olds, targeting, differential item functioning and internal consistency.
Results
The eHEALS had good overall model fit (χ2 = 54.8, p = 0.06), ordered response thresholds, reasonable targeting and good internal consistency (person separation index (PSI) 0.90). It did, however, appear to measure two constructs of eHealth literacy. The HLQ subscales (except subscale 5) did not fit the Rasch model (χ2: 18.18–60.60, p: 0.00–0.58) and had sub-optimal targeting for most subscales. Subscales 6 to 9 displayed disordered thresholds indi-cating participants had difficulty distinguishing between response options. All subscales did, nonetheless, demonstrate moderate to good internal consistency (PSI: 0.62–0.82).

Citation

Richtering, S. S., Morris, R., Soh, S., Barker, A., Bampi, F., Neubeck, L., …Redfern, J. (2017). Examination of an eHealth literacy scale and a health literacy scale in a population with moderate to high cardiovascular risk: Rasch analyses. PLOS ONE, 12(4), Article e0175372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175372

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 6, 2017
Online Publication Date Apr 27, 2017
Publication Date Apr 27, 2017
Deposit Date Apr 28, 2017
Publicly Available Date Apr 28, 2017
Journal PLOS ONE
Print ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 12
Issue 4
Article Number e0175372
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175372
Keywords Electronic health, eHealth, health literacy, cardiovascular disease,
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/834599

Files

Examination of an EHealth literacy scale and a health literacy scale in a population with moderate to high cardiovascular risk: Rasch analysis (1.3 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
© 2017 Richtering et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.







You might also like



Downloadable Citations