Jane Walker
Prevalence, associations, and adequacy of treatment of major depression in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected clinical data
Walker, Jane; Hansen, Christian Holm; Martin, Paul; Symeonides, Stefan; Ramessur, Ravi; Murray, Gordon; Sharpe, Michael
Authors
Christian Holm Hansen
Paul Martin
Stefan Symeonides
Ravi Ramessur
Gordon Murray
Michael Sharpe
Abstract
Background
Major depression is an important complication of cancer. However, reliable data are lacking for the prevalence of depression in patients with cancer in different primary sites, the association of depression with demographic and clinical variables within cancer groupings, and the proportion of depressed patients with cancer receiving potentially effective treatment for depression. We investigated these questions with data from a large representative clinical sample.
Methods
We analysed data from patients with breast, lung, colorectal, genitourinary, or gynaecological cancer who had participated in routine screening for depression in cancer clinics in Scotland, UK between May 12, 2008, and Aug 24, 2011. Depression screening was done in two stages (first, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; then, major depression section of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition). Data for depression status were linked with demographic and clinical data obtained from the Scottish National Cancer Registry.
Findings
We analysed data for 21 151 patients. The prevalence of major depression was highest in patients with lung cancer (13·1%, 95% CI 11·9–14·2%), followed by gynaecological cancer (10·9%, 9·8–12·1), breast cancer (9·3%, 8·7–10·0), colorectal cancer (7·0%, 6·1–8·0), and genitourinary cancer (5·6%, 4·5–6·7). Within these cancer groupings, a diagnosis of major depression was more likely in patients who were younger, had worse social deprivation scores, and, for lung cancer and colorectal cancer, female patients. 1130 (73%) of 1538 patients with depression and complete patient-reported treatment data were not receiving potentially effective treatment.
Interpretation
Major depression is common in patients attending cancer clinics and most goes untreated. A pressing need exists to improve the management of major depression for patients attending specialist cancer services.
Citation
Walker, J., Hansen, C. H., Martin, P., Symeonides, S., Ramessur, R., Murray, G., & Sharpe, M. (2014). Prevalence, associations, and adequacy of treatment of major depression in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected clinical data. Lancet Psychiatry, 1(5), 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366%2814%2970313-x
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Oct 27, 2014 |
Publication Date | Oct 27, 2014 |
Deposit Date | Jun 18, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 18, 2018 |
Journal | The Lancet Psychiatry |
Print ISSN | 2215-0366 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 1 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 343-350 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366%2814%2970313-x |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/688274 |
Files
Prevalence, associations, and adequacy of treatment of major depression in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected clinical data
(354 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0)
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search