Prof Paul Hutton P.Hutton@napier.ac.uk
Professor
In reply to Adams and colleagues
Hutton, Paul; Taylor, Peter J.; Morrison, Anthony P.
Authors
Peter J. Taylor
Anthony P. Morrison
Abstract
Dear Editor
We disagree with the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group’s (CSzG) self-assessment that the problems we identified (Hutton, Wood, Taylor, Irving & Morrison, 2014) in their reviews of popular antipsychotics for schizophrenia are not serious. We encourage people to read the paper (Hutton et al., 2012) where we document the problems in great detail and their likely impact on estimates of efficacy. We have not examined their impact on estimates of adverse effects, but we invite readers to do so.
We reject Professor Adams’ claim that the CSzG was not forewarned that there were serious problems with their review of cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (Jones, Hacker, Cormac, Meaden, & Irving, 2012). In a meeting with the CSzG Editors in 2012, one of us (Paul Hutton) called for both it and their review of risperidone (Rattehalli, Jayaram, & Smith, 2010) to be retracted, fixed and then re-issued. Despite assurances that our concerns would be followed up, we have received no correspondence since then. Both these reviews contain multiple errors which greatly undermine their negative conclusions, yet both have been allowed to continue to influence public policy and debate.
As discussed at the 2012 meeting, we believe the CSzG system for documenting and responding to constructive criticism and feedback is neither transparent nor effective. Until there is evidence of improved responsiveness, we encourage readers to submit their critical feedback to independent and peer-reviewed journals, as we have done.
References
Hutton, P., Morrison, A.P., Yung, A.R., Taylor, P.J., French, P., & Dunn, G. (2012). Effects of drop-out on efficacy estimates in five Cochrane reviews of popular antipsychotics for schizophrenia.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 126,1–11.
Hutton, P., Wood, L., Taylor, P.J., Irving, K., & Morrison, A.P. (2014). Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis: Rationale and protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosis, 6, 220–230.
Jones, C., Hacker, D., Cormac, I., Meaden, A., & Irving, C.B. (2012). Cognitive behaviour therapy versus other psychosocial treatments for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 4, CD008712.
Rattehalli R.D., Jayaram M.B., Smith M. (2010). Risperidone versus placebo for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., CD006918.
Yours sincerely
Paul Hutton
Peter J. Taylor
Anthony P. Morrison
Citation
Hutton, P., Taylor, P. J., & Morrison, A. P. (2015). In reply to Adams and colleagues. Psychosis, 7(4), 367-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2015.1093017
Journal Article Type | Letter |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 7, 2015 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 15, 2015 |
Publication Date | Dec 15, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Dec 15, 2016 |
Journal | Psychosis |
Print ISSN | 1752-2439 |
Electronic ISSN | 1752-2447 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Not Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 7 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 367-367 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2015.1093017 |
Keywords | Psychiatry and Mental health |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/454781 |
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search