Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Shared treatment decision-making and empowerment-related outcomes in psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Stovell, Diana; Morrison, Anthony P.; Panayiotou, Margarita; Hutton, Paul

Authors

Diana Stovell

Anthony P. Morrison

Margarita Panayiotou



Abstract

BACKGROUND:
In the UK almost 60% of people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who use mental health services say they are not involved in decisions about their treatment. Guidelines and policy documents recommend that shared decision-making should be implemented, yet whether it leads to greater treatment-related empowerment for this group has not been systematically assessed.

AIMS:
To examine the effects of shared decision-making on indices of treatment-related empowerment of people with psychosis.

METHOD:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of shared decision-making concerning current or future treatment for psychosis (PROSPERO registration CRD42013006161). Primary outcomes were indices of treatment-related empowerment and objective coercion (compulsory treatment). Secondary outcomes were treatment decision-making ability and the quality of the therapeutic relationship.

RESULTS:
We identified 11 RCTs. Small beneficial effects of increased shared decision-making were found on indices of treatment-related empowerment (6 RCTs; g = 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.51), although the effect was smaller if trials with >25% missing data were excluded. There was a trend towards shared decision-making for future care leading to reduced use of compulsory treatment over 15-18 months (3 RCTs; RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-1.02), with a number needed to treat of approximately 10 (95% CI 5-∞). No clear effect on treatment decision-making ability (3 RCTs) or the quality of the therapeutic relationship (8 RCTs) was found, but data were heterogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS:
For people with psychosis the implementation of shared treatment decision-making appears to have small beneficial effects on indices of treatment-related empowerment, but more direct evidence is required.

Citation

Stovell, D., Morrison, A. P., Panayiotou, M., & Hutton, P. (2016). Shared treatment decision-making and empowerment-related outcomes in psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 209(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.158931

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 15, 2015
Online Publication Date Jan 2, 2018
Publication Date 2016-07
Deposit Date Dec 15, 2016
Publicly Available Date Aug 1, 2017
Journal British Journal of Psychiatry
Print ISSN 0007-1250
Electronic ISSN 1472-1465
Publisher Royal College of Psychiatrists
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 209
Issue 1
Pages 23-28
DOI https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.158931
Keywords Schizophrenia, shared-decision making, patient empowerment, psychosis,
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/454736
Contract Date Feb 15, 2017

Files

Effect of shared decision making on empowerment-related outcomes in psychosis... (645 Kb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
This is an author-produced electronic version of an article accepted for publication in the British Journal of Psychiatry. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at http://bjp.rcpsych.org)








You might also like



Downloadable Citations