Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cost-effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs Moderate Intensity Steady-State (MISS) Training in UK Cardiac Rehabilitation

Albustami, Mohammed; Hartfiel, Ned; Charles, Joanna M; Powell, Richard; Begg, Brian; Birkett, Stefan T; Nichols, Simon; Ennis, Stuart; Hee, Siew Wan; Banerjee, Prithwish; Ingle, Lee; Shave, Rob; Mcgregor, Gordon; Edwards, Rhiannon T

Authors

Mohammed Albustami

Ned Hartfiel

Joanna M Charles

Richard Powell

Brian Begg

Stefan T Birkett

Stuart Ennis

Siew Wan Hee

Prithwish Banerjee

Lee Ingle

Rob Shave

Gordon Mcgregor

Rhiannon T Edwards



Abstract

Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) compared with moderate intensity steady-state (MISS) training in people with coronary artery disease (CAD) attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Design: Secondary cost-effectiveness analysis of a prospective, assessor-blind, parallel group, multi-center RCT. Setting: Six outpatient National Health Service cardiac rehabilitation centers in England and Wales, UK. Participants: 382 participants with CAD (N=382). Interventions: Participants were randomized to twice-weekly usual care (n=195) or HIIT (n=187) for 8 weeks. Usual care was moderate intensity continuous exercise (60%-80% maximum capacity, MISS), while HIIT consisted of 10 £ 1-minute intervals of vigorous exercise (>85% maximum capacity) interspersed with 1-minute periods of recovery. Main Outcome Measures: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of the HIIT or MISS UK trial. Health related quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs were estimated with health service resource use and intervention delivery costs. Cost-utility analysis measured the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Bootstrapping assessed the probability of HIIT being cost-effective according to the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) threshold value (£20,000 per QALY). Missing data were imputed. Uncertainty was estimated using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Assumptions were tested using univariate/1-way sensitivity analysis.

Citation

Albustami, M., Hartfiel, N., Charles, J. M., Powell, R., Begg, B., Birkett, S. T., Nichols, S., Ennis, S., Hee, S. W., Banerjee, P., Ingle, L., Shave, R., Mcgregor, G., & Edwards, R. T. (2024). Cost-effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs Moderate Intensity Steady-State (MISS) Training in UK Cardiac Rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 105(4), 639-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.005

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 5, 2023
Online Publication Date Sep 18, 2024
Publication Date 2024-04
Deposit Date Oct 28, 2024
Publicly Available Date Oct 28, 2024
Print ISSN 0003-9993
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 105
Issue 4
Pages 639-646
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.005
Keywords Coronary artery disease, Exercise training, Health economics, Health utility, National Health Service, Rehabilitation
Publisher URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999323005294

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations