Monika Kastner
Development of a prototype clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management: A qualitative study of focus groups
Kastner, Monika; Li, Jamy; Lottridge, Danielle; Marquez, Christine; Newton, David; Straus, Sharon E.
Authors
Dr Jamy Li J.Li3@napier.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Danielle Lottridge
Christine Marquez
David Newton
Sharon E. Straus
Abstract
Background
Osteoporosis affects over 200 million people worldwide, and represents a significant cost burden. Although guidelines are available for best practice in osteoporosis, evidence indicates that patients are not receiving appropriate diagnostic testing or treatment according to guidelines. The use of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) may be one solution because they can facilitate knowledge translation by providing high-quality evidence at the point of care. Findings from a systematic review of osteoporosis interventions and consultation with clinical and human factors engineering experts were used to develop a conceptual model of an osteoporosis tool. We conducted a qualitative study of focus groups to better understand physicians' perceptions of CDSSs and to transform the conceptual osteoporosis tool into a functional prototype that can support clinical decision making in osteoporosis disease management at the point of care.
Methods
The conceptual design of the osteoporosis tool was tested in 4 progressive focus groups with family physicians and general internists. An iterative strategy was used to qualitatively explore the experiences of physicians with CDSSs; and to find out what features, functions, and evidence should be included in a working prototype. Focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide using an iterative process where results of the first focus group informed changes to the questions for subsequent focus groups and to the conceptual tool design. Transcripts were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using grounded theory methodology.
Results
Of the 3 broad categories of themes that were identified, major barriers related to the accuracy and feasibility of extracting bone mineral density test results and medications from the risk assessment questionnaire; using an electronic input device such as a Tablet PC in the waiting room; and the importance of including well-balanced information in the patient education component of the osteoporosis tool. Suggestions for modifying the tool included the addition of a percentile graph showing patients' 10-year risk for osteoporosis or fractures, and ensuring that the tool takes no more than 5 minutes to complete.
Conclusions
Focus group data revealed the facilitators and barriers to using the osteoporosis tool at the point of care so that it can be optimized to aid physicians in their clinical decision making.
Citation
Kastner, M., Li, J., Lottridge, D., Marquez, C., Newton, D., & Straus, S. E. (2010). Development of a prototype clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management: A qualitative study of focus groups. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-40
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 22, 2010 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 22, 2010 |
Publication Date | 2010 |
Deposit Date | May 7, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | May 8, 2024 |
Electronic ISSN | 1472-6947 |
Publisher | BMC |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 10 |
Article Number | 40 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-40 |
Files
Development Of A Prototype Clinical Decision Support Tool For Osteoporosis Disease Management: A Qualitative Study Of Focus Groups
(9.5 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
You might also like
Media Format Matters: User Engagement with Audio, Text and Video Tweets
(2024)
Journal Article
The Evolution of HCI and Human Factors: Integrating Human and Artificial Intelligence
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search