Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Weakness exploitation: Predicting socially communicative devices as a successor to internet-based graphical user interfaces

Li, Jamy; Chignell, Mark

Authors

Mark Chignell



Abstract

Existing theories of technology transitions cannot predict what new technological paradigm will supplant the currently leading, internet-enabled graphical user interface paradigm. This article introduces a preliminary approach (‘weakness exploitation’) to explain the rise and fall of four technology ‘empires’: print, television, the internet and socially interactive devices (such as robots, chatbots and internet of things devices). The approach is related to technology diffusion and disruptive innovation, but with a predictive element induced from Marshall McLuhan’s descriptions of print and television as ‘extensions’ of the senses. It is applied to the internet as an historical example of a technology transition outside of McLuhan’s original analysis and to explain why excessive exposure to screen-rendered digital media as the internet’s exclusive access point may be replaced by a new ‘age’ of computationally intelligent, socially communicative devices. This new approach can help researchers and technologists conceptualize transitions between usage of incumbent and emerging technologies.

Citation

Li, J., & Chignell, M. (2023). Weakness exploitation: Predicting socially communicative devices as a successor to internet-based graphical user interfaces. Explorations in Media Ecology, 22(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00150_1

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 10, 2022
Online Publication Date Mar 21, 2023
Publication Date Mar 21, 2023
Deposit Date May 7, 2024
Journal Explorations in Media Ecology
Print ISSN 1539-7785
Electronic ISSN 2048-0717
Publisher Intellect
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 22
Issue 1
Pages 49–74
DOI https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00150_1
Keywords conversational agents; innovation; internet of things; media ecology; media progression; philosophy of technology; robots; technology adoption
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/3636816