Dr Arthur Bossi A.Bossi@napier.ac.uk
Consultant - MTBCOS
Dr Arthur Bossi A.Bossi@napier.ac.uk
Consultant - MTBCOS
Pedro Lima
Jorge Perrout de Lima
James Hopker
This study aimed to assess the relationship between an uphill time-trial (TT) performance and both aerobic and anaerobic parameters obtained from laboratory tests. Fifteen cyclists performed a Wingate anaerobic test, a graded exercise test (GXT) and a field-based 20-min TT with 2.7% mean gradient. After a 5-week non-supervised training period, 10 of them performed a second TT for analysis of pacing reproducibility. Stepwise multiple regressions demonstrated that 91% of TT mean power output variation (W kg−1) could be explained by peak oxygen uptake (ml kg−1.min−1) and the respiratory compensation point (W kg−1), with standardised beta coefficients of 0.64 and 0.39, respectively. The agreement between mean power output and power at respiratory compensation point showed a bias ± random error of 16.2 ± 51.8 W or 5.7 ± 19.7%. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of the time interval (123.1 ± 8.7; 97.8 ± 1.2 and 94.0 ± 7.2% of mean power output, for epochs 0–2, 2–18 and 18–20 min, respectively; P < 0.001), characterising a positive pacing profile. This study indicates that an uphill, 20-min TT-type performance is correlated to aerobic physiological GXT variables and that cyclists adopt reproducible pacing strategies when they are tested 5 weeks apart (coefficients of variation of 6.3; 1 and 4%, for 0–2, 2–18 and 18–20 min, respectively).
Bossi, A. H., Lima, P., Lima, J. P. D., & Hopker, J. (2017). Laboratory predictors of uphill cycling performance in trained cyclists. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(14), 1364-1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1182199
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 19, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | May 7, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jul 18, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Aug 16, 2022 |
Journal | Journal of Sports Sciences |
Print ISSN | 0264-0414 |
Electronic ISSN | 1466-447X |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 35 |
Issue | 14 |
Pages | 1364-1371 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1182199 |
Keywords | Power output, field test, VO2max, pacing strategy, self-paced exercise |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2896961 |
Optimizing Interval Training Through Power-Output Variation Within the Work Intervals
(2020)
Journal Article
Energy Expenditure Equation Choice: Effects on Cycling Efficiency and its Reliability
(2020)
Journal Article
Functional Threshold Power in Cyclists: Validity of the Concept and Physiological Responses
(2018)
Journal Article
Pacing Strategy and Tactical Positioning During Cyclo-Cross Races
(2018)
Journal Article
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Advanced Search