Switching antipsychotic medication to reduce sexual dysfunction in people with psychosis: the REMEDY RCT

Crawford, Michael J; Thana, Lavanya; Evans, Rachel; Carne, Alexandra; O�Connell, Lesley; Claringbold, Amy; Saravanamuthu, Arunan; Case, Rebecca; Munjiza, Jasna; Jayacodi, Sandra; Reilly, Joseph G; Hughes, Elizabeth; Hoare, Zoe; Barrett, Barbara; Leeson, Verity C; Paton, Carol; Keown, Patrick; Pappa, Sofia; Green, Charlotte; Barnes, Thomas RE

Abstract

Background
Sexual dysfunction is common among people who are prescribed antipsychotic medication for psychosis. Sexual dysfunction can impair quality of life and reduce treatment adherence. Switching antipsychotic medication may help, but the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this approach is unclear.

Objective
To examine whether or not switching antipsychotic medication provides a clinically effective and cost-effective method to reduce sexual dysfunction in people with psychosis.

Design
A two-arm, researcher-blind, pilot randomised trial with a parallel qualitative study and an internal pilot phase. Study participants were randomised to enhanced standard care plus a switch of antipsychotic medication or enhanced standard care alone in a 1 : 1 ratio. Randomisation was via an independent and remote web-based service using dynamic adaptive allocation, stratified by age, gender, Trust and relationship status.

Setting
NHS secondary care mental health services in England.

Participants
Potential participants had to be aged ≥ 18 years, have schizophrenia or related psychoses and experience sexual dysfunction associated with the use of antipsychotic medication. We recruited only people for whom reduction in medication dosage was ineffective or inappropriate. We excluded those who were acutely unwell, had had a change in antipsychotic medication in the last 6 weeks, were currently prescribed clozapine or whose sexual dysfunction was believed to be due to a coexisting physical or mental disorder.

Interventions
Switching to an equivalent dose of one of three antipsychotic medications that are considered to have a relatively low propensity for sexual side effects (i.e. quetiapine, aripiprazole or olanzapine). All participants were offered brief psychoeducation and support to discuss their sexual health and functioning.

Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was patient-reported sexual dysfunction, measured using the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale. Secondary outcomes were researcher-rated sexual functioning, mental health, side effects of medication, health-related quality of life and service utilisation. Outcomes were assessed 3 and 6 months after randomisation. Qualitative data were collected from a purposive sample of patients and clinicians to explore barriers to recruitment.

Sample size
Allowing for a 20% loss to follow-up, we needed to recruit 216 participants to have 90% power to detect a 3-point difference in total Arizona Sexual Experience Scale score (standard deviation 6.0 points) using a 0.05 significance level.

Results
The internal pilot was discontinued after 12 months because of low recruitment. Ninety-eight patients were referred to the study between 1 July 2018 and 30 June 2019, of whom 10 were randomised. Eight (80%) participants were followed up 3 months later. Barriers to referral and recruitment included staff apprehensions about discussing side effects, reluctance among patients to switch medication and reticence of both staff and patients to talk about sex.

Limitations
Insufficient numbers of participants were recruited to examine the study hypotheses.

Conclusions
It may not be possible to conduct a successful randomised trial of switching antipsychotic medication for sexual functioning in people with psychosis in the NHS at this time.

Future work
Research examining the acceptability and effectiveness of adjuvant phosphodiesterase inhibitors should be considered.

Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12307891.

Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 44. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Sep 30, 2020
• Publication Date: 2020-09
• Deposit Date: Feb 1, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: Feb 2, 2022
• Journal: Health Technology Assessment
• Print ISSN: 1366-5278
• Electronic ISSN: 2046-4924
• Publisher: NIHR Journals Library
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 24
• Issue: 44
• Pages: 1-54
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24440
• Public URL: http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2839752
• Publisher URL: https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta24440#/abstract