Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Research: metrics, quality, and management implications

Andras, Peter

Authors

Profile Image

Prof Peter Andras P.Andras@napier.ac.uk
Dean of School of Computing Engineering and the Built Environment



Abstract

Research evaluation is increasingly important in management decisions in universities. Research metrics provide an objective way to assess the research output of individuals, groups, departments and universities. Such metrics work well as quality assessment tools in the case of normal science research in mature sciences, and also in the case of early stage sciences containing a significant amount of research that is meant to be revolutionary. Revolutionary research in mature sciences and unfashionable revolutionary research in early stage sciences remain mostly invisible to research metrics in the short term. This kind of research may become measurable in the long term if it turns out to be successful and generates a large volume of follow-on research that becomes part of normal science. Pursuing revolutionary research is risky, and this risk is modulated by the availability of an appropriate research workforce and the funding environment. Hype and spin are part of the mechanisms of scientific public opinion, and dealing with these is important in the context of management decisions based on research metrics.

Citation

Andras, P. (2011). Research: metrics, quality, and management implications. Research Evaluation, 20(2), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876265

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date 2011-06
Deposit Date Nov 2, 2021
Journal Research Evaluation
Print ISSN 0958-2029
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 20
Issue 2
Pages 90-106
DOI https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876265
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2808973