Emilie Ghio
Because the EU said so? Rethinking the Concept of Harmonisation
Ghio, Emilie
Authors
Abstract
This article debunks the claim that European harmonisation initiatives are made in Brussels behind closed doors and are detached from national realities and domestic practices. This article demonstrates that there is an underlying misunderstanding surrounding the concept of harmonisation, which primarily stems from an incorrect use of different terms, in particular 'harmonisation', 'approximation' and 'convergence'. The field of European cross-border insolvency and rescue law is used as a case study to reveal that in this particular legal field, harmonisation initiatives have mostly stemmed from bottom-up regulatory methods, rather than strict top-down measures.
Presentation Conference Type | Conference Paper (unpublished) |
---|---|
Conference Name | Society of Legal Scholars Annual Conference |
Start Date | Sep 4, 2018 |
End Date | Sep 7, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Sep 11, 2021 |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2801236 |
You might also like
Harmonisation in Times of Crisis
(2021)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Time to Renew the Debate on Insolvency Law: Out With Theoretical Ideas, In With Pragmatism
(2016)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
The Shift Needed in the European Debate on Cross-Border Insolvency Law
(2016)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
European Insolvency Law: Where to Now?
(2016)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search