Daniel Riddle
Cross-Validation of Good versus Poor Self-reported Outcome Trajectory Types Following Knee Arthroplasty
Riddle, Daniel; MacFarlane, Gary; Hamilton, David; Beasley, Marcus; Dumenci, Levent
Authors
Gary MacFarlane
David Hamilton
Marcus Beasley
Levent Dumenci
Abstract
Objective
To determine whether good versus poor outcome trajectories and predictors of poor outcome obtained in a derivation study could be replicated in an independent sample of persons undergoing knee arthroplasty (KA).
Methods
We used data from TRIO-POPULAR, a prospective cohort study of 926 participants who underwent KA in the United Kingdom. The participants were assessed preoperatively and 6-weeks, 6- and 12-months postoperatively. The Oxford Knee Score was the primary outcome and a variety of pre-operative predictors of outcome were selected. The outcome measure and the predictors were selected to most closely align with a previously published derivation study of good versus poor outcome. Confirmatory two-piece latent class growth curve analyses were used to model outcome and regression was used to identify predictors of outcome class.
Results
Trajectories for the Oxford Knee Scores from TRIO-POPULAR replicated trajectories for WOMAC Pain and Function scores from the previously published derivation study. Multivariable predictors of poor outcome were pain catastrophizing (odds ratio = 1.125, 95% CI = 1.048, .206, p=0.001) and comorbidity (odds ratio = 1.134, 95%CI = 1.049, 1.227, p=0.002. Pain catastrophizing also predicted poor outcome in the derivation study.
Conclusions
Good and poor outcome trajectories replicated those found in the previously published derivation study. Our model-based method produces stable outcome trajectories despite using data from different countries and participants with substantively different characteristics. Predictors of poor outcome were somewhat inconsistent between the cross-validation and derivation studies. Pain catastrophizing was the only consistent poor outcome predictor.
Citation
Riddle, D., MacFarlane, G., Hamilton, D., Beasley, M., & Dumenci, L. (2022). Cross-Validation of Good versus Poor Self-reported Outcome Trajectory Types Following Knee Arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 30(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2021.09.004
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 6, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 14, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2022-01 |
Deposit Date | Oct 18, 2021 |
Journal | Osteoarthritis and Cartilage |
Print ISSN | 1063-4584 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 30 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 61-68 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2021.09.004 |
Keywords | knee, outcome, arthroplasty |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2800631 |
You might also like
Notchplasty is associated with decreased risk of anterior cruciate ligament graft revision
(2022)
Journal Article
The effect of sarcopenia on outcomes following orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search