Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Choice of spectroscopic line shape model affects metabolite peak areas and area ratios.

Marshall, Ian; Bruce, Stephen Derek; Higinbotham, John; MacLullich, Alasdair; Wardlaw, Joanna M; Ferguson, Karen J; Seckl, Jonathan

Authors

Ian Marshall

Stephen Derek Bruce

John Higinbotham

Alasdair MacLullich

Joanna M Wardlaw

Karen J Ferguson

Jonathan Seckl



Abstract

The use of Lorentzian model lineshapes leads to systematic errors in the quantification of in vivo (1)H NMR spectra. Experimental lineshapes are better modeled by the Voigt (mixed Lorentzian-Gaussian) function, leading to more accurate fits (reduced chi(2)). In this work, results from a group of 41 subjects are presented. It is shown that not only are the estimated metabolite peak areas affected by the choice of lineshape model, but so too are the metabolite ratios. For example, the NAA/choline ratio was 1.92 +/- 0.06 (mean +/- standard error) using the Lorentzian lineshape model and 1.85 +/- 0.05 using the Voigt lineshape model. The corresponding figures for NAA/creatine were 2.32 +/- 0.06 and 2. 10 +/- 0.05 respectively, which are significantly different for the two lineshape models. An explanation of this previously unreported effect is given. This finding clearly has serious implications for the methodology and reporting of spectroscopic studies.

Citation

Marshall, I., Bruce, S. D., Higinbotham, J., MacLullich, A., Wardlaw, J. M., Ferguson, K. J., & Seckl, J. (2000). Choice of spectroscopic line shape model affects metabolite peak areas and area ratios. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 44, 646-649. doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:43.0.CO;2-0

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date 2000
Deposit Date Nov 8, 2012
Print ISSN 0740-3194
Electronic ISSN 1522-2594
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 44
Pages 646-649
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594%28200010%2944%3A43.0.CO%3B2-0
Keywords Spectroscopy; quantification; modeling; lineshape; Voigt
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/5734
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:43.0.CO;2-0