Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Recommendations for the conduct of efficacy trials of treatment devices for osteoarthritis: a report from a working group of the Arthritis Research UK Osteoarthritis and Crystal Diseases Clinical Studies Group

Felson, David T.; Redmond, Anthony C.; Chapman, Graham J.; Smith, Toby O.; Hamilton, David F.; Jones, Richard K.; Holt, Cathy A.; Callaghan, Michael J.; Mason, Deborah J.; Arthritis Research UK Osteoarthritis and Crystal Diseases Clinical Studies Group; Conaghan, Philip G.

Authors

David T. Felson

Anthony C. Redmond

Graham J. Chapman

Toby O. Smith

David F. Hamilton

Richard K. Jones

Cathy A. Holt

Michael J. Callaghan

Deborah J. Mason

Arthritis Research UK Osteoarthritis and Crystal Diseases Clinical Studies Group

Philip G. Conaghan



Abstract

Objective. There are unique challenges to designing and carrying out high-quality trials testing therapeutic devices in OA and other rheumatic diseases. Such challenges include determining the mechanisms of action of the device and the appropriate sham. Design of device trials is more challenging than that of placebo-controlled drug trials. Our aim was to develop recommendations for designing device trials.

Methods. An Arthritis Research UK study group comprised of 30 rheumatologists, physiotherapists, podiatrists, engineers, orthopaedists, trialists and patients, including many who have carried out device trials, met and (using a Delphi-styled approach) came to consensus on recommendations for device trials.

Results. Challenges unique to device trials include defining the mechanism of action of the device and, therefore, the appropriate sham that provides a placebo effect without duplicating the action of the active device. Should there be no clear-cut mechanism of action, a three-arm trial including a no-treatment arm and one with presumed sham action was recommended. For individualized devices, generalizable indications and standardization of the devices are needed so that treatments can be generalized.

Conclusion. A consensus set of recommendations for device trials was developed, providing a basis for improved trial design, and hopefully improvement in the number of effective therapeutic devices for rheumatic diseases.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 5, 2015
Online Publication Date Sep 10, 2015
Publication Date 2016-02
Deposit Date Nov 9, 2020
Journal Rheumatology
Print ISSN 1462-0324
Electronic ISSN 1462-0332
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 55
Issue 2
Pages 320-326
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev328
Keywords osteoarthritis, clinical trials, efficacy, devices, brace, orthoses, recommendations
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2698578