Formalizing botanical taxonomies.
Because botanical taxonomies are prototypical classifications it would seem that it should be easy to formalize them as concept lattices or type hierarchies. On closer inspection, however, one discovers that such a formalization is quite challenging to obtain. First, botanical taxonomies consist of several interrelated hierarchies, such as a specimen-based plant typology, a name hierarchy and a ranking system. Depending on the circumstances each of these can be primary or secondary for the formation of the taxonomy. Second, botanical taxonomies must comply with botanical nomenclature which follows a complicated rule system and is historically grown. Third, it may be difficult to design a formalization that is both mathematically appropriate and has a semantics which matches a taxonomist's intuition. The process of formalizing botanical taxonomies with formal concept analysis methods highlights such problems and can serve as a foundation for solutions.
Priss, U. (2003). Formalizing botanical taxonomies. . https://doi.org/10.1007/b11835
|Conference Name||Conceptual Structures for Knowledge Creation and Communication. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Conceptual Structures|
|Start Date||Jul 21, 2003|
|End Date||Jul 25, 2003|
|Publication Date||Jan 1, 2003|
|Deposit Date||Jun 4, 2008|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||Computer software; Botany; Taxonomy; Hierarchical classifications; Priorities; Traditional nomenclature; Intuitive semantics; Formal concept analysis;|
You might also like
Modelling lexical databases with formal concept analysis.
Linguistic applications of formal concept analysis.
Conceptual exploration of semantic mirrors.
FCA interpretation of relation algebra.
Bilingual word association networks.