Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Doing a doctorate in business administration: The case for critical reflexivity

Oerton, Sarah; Farrell, Catherine; Plant, Eoin


Sarah Oerton

Catherine Farrell


This paper focuses upon the value of critical reflexivity in illuminating practice-based management inquiry. Drawing upon contributions to debates in the field, the paper demonstrates how critical reflexivity permits interrogation of the dynamic tensions associated with ‘real life’ practice and scholarly research on Doctor in Business Administration (DBA) programmes. It offers clearer understanding of the complex journeys undertaken, greater recognition of the organizational and cultural landscapes inhabited, and broadens concepts of how ‘success’ on DBA programmes may be evaluated. The paper further argues that critical reflexivity plays a key role in highlighting the various processes underlying the design, management and delivery of DBA programmes. In this way, the paper offers useful insights likely to be of interest not only to taught doctoral students in the field but also academics involved in developing practice-based management programmes in higher education. The paper's arguments are developed using a qualitative methodological approach underpinned by two primary data sets collected from different cohorts of students on DBA programmes and secondary sources subject to retrospective content analysis.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 11, 2018
Online Publication Date Jun 13, 2018
Publication Date 2018-11
Deposit Date Nov 6, 2019
Publicly Available Date Nov 6, 2019
Journal The International Journal of Management Education
Print ISSN 1472-8117
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 16
Issue 3
Pages 370-379
Keywords Critical reflexivity, Doctor in Business Administration, Professional doctorate
Public URL


You might also like

Downloadable Citations