Some thoughts on peer review

Schwartz, Candy; Hernon, Peter; Burnett, Gary; Hall, Hazel; Pomerantz, Jeff; Savolainen, Reijo; Thelwall, Mike

Abstract

From time to time, we like to invite the members of our Board of Editors to comment on a matter of current interest, either related to publishing or to research in library and information science. This time we took the theme of peer review, the focus of “The manuscript reviewing process,” by Lutz Bornmann and Hans-Dieter Daniel, published in this issue. We sent a preprint of the article to the Board, along with a series of questions, and a number of our Board colleagues were gracious enough to share their thoughts in response to a series of questions.

Citation

Schwartz, C., Hernon, P., Burnett, G., Hall, H., Pomerantz, J., Savolainen, R., & Thelwall, M. (2010). Some thoughts on peer review. Library and Information Science Research, 32(1), 13-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.12.003

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Dec 10, 2009
• Online Publication Date: Jan 15, 2010
• Publication Date: 2010-01
• Deposit Date: Jun 29, 2010
• Journal: Library & Information Science Research
• Print ISSN: 0740-8188
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 32
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 13-15
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.12.003
• Keywords: Peer review; research; reviewing; editing
• Public URL: http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/3756