Stuart Cunningham
Subjective Evaluation of Music Compressed with the ACER Codec Compared to AAC, MP3, and Uncompressed PCM
Cunningham, Stuart; McGregor, Iain
Abstract
Audio data compression has revolutionised the way in which the music industry and musicians sell and distribute their products. Our previous research presented a novel codec named ACER (Audio Compression Exploiting Repetition), which achieves data reduction by exploiting irrelevancy and redundancy in musical structure whilst generally maintaining acceptable levels of noise and distortion in objective evaluations. However, previous work did not evaluate ACER using subjective listening tests, leaving a gap to demonstrate its applicability under human audio perception tests. In this paper, we present a double-blind listening test that was conducted with a range of listeners (N=100). The aim was to determine the efficacy of the ACER codec, in terms of perceptible noise and spatial distortion artefacts, against de facto standards for audio data compression and an uncompressed reference. Results show that participants reported no perceived differences between the uncompressed, MP3, AAC, ACER high quality, and ACER medium quality compressed audio in terms of noise and distortions but that the ACER low quality format was perceived as being of lower quality. However, in terms of participants’ perceptions of the stereo field, all formats under test performed as well as each other, with no statistically significant differences. A qualitative, thematic analysis of listeners’ feedback revealed that the noise artefacts that produced the ACER technique are different from those of comparator codecs, reflecting its novel approach. Results show that the quality of contemporary audio compression systems has reached a stage where their performance is perceived to be as good as uncompressed audio. The ACER format is able to compete as an alternative, with results showing a preference for the ACER medium quality versions over WAV, MP3, and AAC. The ACER process itself is viable on its own or in conjunction with techniques such as MP3 and AAC.
Citation
Cunningham, S., & McGregor, I. (2019). Subjective Evaluation of Music Compressed with the ACER Codec Compared to AAC, MP3, and Uncompressed PCM. International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting, 2019, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8265301
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 17, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 11, 2019 |
Publication Date | Jul 11, 2019 |
Deposit Date | Jul 13, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 15, 2019 |
Journal | International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting |
Print ISSN | 1687-7578 |
Electronic ISSN | 1687-7586 |
Publisher | Hindawi |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 2019 |
Pages | 1-16 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8265301 |
Keywords | Media Technology; Electrical and Electronic Engineering; Communication |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/1959453 |
Contract Date | Jul 15, 2019 |
Files
Subjective Evaluation of Music Compressed with the ACER Codec Compared to AAC, MP3, and Uncompressed PCM
(2.5 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2019 Stuart Cunningham and Iain McGregor. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
PEMS: Peoples Experience Of Mountain Soundscapes
(2025)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Audio Occlusion Experiment Data
(2025)
Data
Pedagogical Approaches in Music and Audio Education for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students
(2024)
Journal Article
Auditory Occlusion Based on the Human Body in the Direct Sound Path: Measured and Perceivable Effects
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search