Prof Austyn Snowden A.Snowden@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Concurrent analysis: a pragmatic justification
Snowden, Austyn; Atkinson, John
Authors
John Atkinson
Abstract
Concurrent analysis (CA) is a process of synthesizing conceptually equivalent data for the purpose of producing a coherent and predictive model in social science. The process of CA is detailed. In short, CA uses Thagard's concept of coherence as a method of explicating links between mental representations. The product is a wide analysis of all pertinent data. This paper provides a philosophical justification for the need and function of CA. The paper is divided into three sections. The first section reviews some problems with the metasynthetic literature. The purpose of this is that CA can be initially understood as a branch of this type of synthesis. The second section links Risjord's post-paradigmatic position to Rorty's version of pragmatism in order to show the importance of the concept of coherence to these views. The reason for linking these issues is that CA is grounded in rejection of ontological priority. Instead it prioritises a pragmatic conception of coherence. The final section details the mechanics of CA. Concurrent analysis is presented as the most coherent method of synthesizing certain types of narrative evidence if pragmatism is prioritized over ontology. Examples are given from published studies using CA to illustrate the detail of the analysis and the practical value of the product. The examples show that CA appears useful under certain circumstances. These circumstances will be specified, and strengths and weaknesses of the method will be discussed.
Citation
Snowden, A., & Atkinson, J. (2012). Concurrent analysis: a pragmatic justification. Nursing Philosophy, 13, 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2011.00523.x
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2012 |
Deposit Date | Aug 19, 2015 |
Print ISSN | 1466-7681 |
Electronic ISSN | 1466-769X |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Pages | 126-141 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2011.00523.x |
Keywords | epistemology; ethics; methodology; nursing research; philosophy of science; |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/9009 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2011.00523.x |
You might also like
Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial
(2023)
Journal Article
Statistical Fit is like Beauty: a Rasch and Factor Analysis of the Scottish PROM
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search