Prof Austyn Snowden A.Snowden@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Prof Austyn Snowden A.Snowden@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Jenny Young
Denis Roberge
Stefano Schipani
Esther Murray
Claude Richard
Marie-Therese Lussier
Craig White
Design Analyst blinded, parallel, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Participants People with confirmed diagnoses of cancer (head and neck, skin or colorectal) attending follow-up consultation 3 months post-treatment between 2015 and 2020.
Intervention Holistic needs assessment (HNA) or care as usual during consultation.
Objective To establish whether incorporating HNA into consultations would increase patient participation, shared decision making and postconsultation self-efficacy.
Outcome measures Patient participation in the consultations examined was measured using (a) dialogue ratio (DR) and (b) the proportion of consultation initiated by patient. Shared decision making was measured with CollaboRATE and self-efficacy with Lorig Scale. Consultations were audio recorded and timed.
Randomisation Block randomisation.
Blinding Audio recording analyst was blinded to study group.
Results 147 patients were randomised: 74 control versus 73 intervention.
Outcome No statistically significant differences were found between groups for DR, patient initiative, self-efficacy or shared decision making. Consultations were on average 1 min 46 s longer in the HNA group (respectively, 17 m 25 s vs 15 min 39 s).
Conclusion HNA did not change the amount of conversation initiated by the patient or the level of dialogue within the consultation. HNA did not change patient sense of collaboration or feelings of self-efficacy afterwards. HNA group raised more concerns and proportionally more emotional concerns, although their consultations took longer than treatment as usual.
Implications for practice This is the first RCT to test HNA in medically led outpatient settings. Results showed no difference in the way the consultations were structured or received. There is wider evidence to support the roll out of HNA as part of a proactive, multidisciplinary process, but this study did not support medical colleagues facilitating it.
Trial registration number NCT02274701.
Snowden, A., Young, J., Roberge, D., Schipani, S., Murray, E., Richard, C., Lussier, M.-T., & White, C. (2023). Holistic needs assessment in outpatient cancer care: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 13(5), Article e066829. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066829
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 19, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | May 4, 2023 |
Publication Date | 2023-05 |
Deposit Date | May 17, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | May 17, 2023 |
Journal | BMJ Open |
Electronic ISSN | 2044-6055 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Issue | 5 |
Article Number | e066829 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066829 |
Holistic Needs Assessment In Outpatient Cancer Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial
(1 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistical Fit is like Beauty: a Rasch and Factor Analysis of the Scottish PROM
(2021)
Journal Article
Evaluation of Improving the Cancer Journey: Final Report
(2020)
Report
Understanding the outcomes of spiritual care as experienced by patients
(2020)
Journal Article
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search