Dr Amanda Pitkethly A.Pitkethly@napier.ac.uk
Lecturer
Teachers’ and young adolescents’ qualitative opinions of an eight-week, feasibility/pilot, sit-stand desk intervention
Pitkethly, Amanda; Campbell, Anna; Sproule, John; Booth, Josie; Fawkner, Sam; Hutson, Danielle
Authors
Prof Anna Campbell A.Campbell4@napier.ac.uk
Professor
John Sproule
Josie Booth
Sam Fawkner
Danielle Hutson
Abstract
Aim: Nine sit-stand desks were installed in an Edinburgh Primary 7 class to determine the feasibility of their use and the effects on sedentary, activity, learning outcome variables. This abstract details the qualitative aspect of this study to discover how the sit-stand desks were tolerated.
Methods: After the feasibility/pilot study, individual interviews were held with the class and student teacher, and the classroom assistant (n = 3). Eight out of twenty pupils (all provided parental consent), participated in two focus groups (pupils selected by the teacher), one high-use group (n = 4), and one low-use group (n = 4).
Results: Overall, the staff were very supportive of the desks reporting that they contributed positively allowing pupils to be physical without being disruptive. Over the eight weeks, less disruption, more confidence and autonomy, as well as positive pupil behaviours were apparent. For example, confidence to move from their seated desks to sit-stand desks, improved cooperation with classmates, use of the sit-stand desks when low in energy, and improved engagement with class work, were all observed whilst pupils used the sit-stand desks. The desks also provided teachers with the opportunity to reorganise the learning space to support pupils with needs. Nothing negative was reported, although staff felt that prior to using the desks children should be encouraged to develop a rationale for doing so. All pupils reported being able to concentrate more when they used the sit-stand desks, with one pupil reporting ‘being able to ignore the laziness’. All pupils enjoyed being allowed to move more, as well as having more personal space, the changeable desk height, and more leg freedom. The high-use group reported better sleep, higher energy levels, improved daily mile achievement as well as improvements in extra-curricular activities. One pupil reported less need for her asthma inhaler, and another pupil with fallen arches reported that using the sit-stand desks helped her feel less pain.
Conclusions: The eight-week intervention was well tolerated by all teachers and pupils with positive suggestions for improved use in future interventions.
Citation
Pitkethly, A., Campbell, A., Sproule, J., Booth, J., Fawkner, S., & Hutson, D. (2017, November). Teachers’ and young adolescents’ qualitative opinions of an eight-week, feasibility/pilot, sit-stand desk intervention. Poster presented at Scottish Physical Activity Research Connections 2017, University of Edinburgh
Presentation Conference Type | Poster |
---|---|
Conference Name | Scottish Physical Activity Research Connections 2017 |
Start Date | Nov 23, 2017 |
End Date | Nov 23, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Jun 12, 2019 |
Keywords | Physical activity, standing desks, sedentary. |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/1871033 |
Additional Information | Appears in SPARC 2017 Abstracts : Oral and Poster Abstracts |
You might also like
Student engagement and curriculum design within Clinical Exercise Physiology
(2023)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Nursing and physiotherapy students’ engagement in an online physical activity promotion education programme: A mixed methods pilot study
(2022)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
MSc CEP Curriculum Framework
(2022)
Other
Addressing concerns between curricula and employability: Can we do more?
(2022)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search