Is counselling necessary? Making the decision to have an abortion. A qualitative interview study.

Brown, Sally

doi:10.3109/13625187.2012.750290

Authors

Sally Brown

Abstract

Objectives To explore young women’s decision-making about having an abortion, in particular, how they reached the decision and with whom they discussed it.
Methods Qualitative study comprising semi-structured one-to-one interviews with 24 women aged between 16 and 20 who were waiting for, or had recently had, a surgical abortion. Interviews were recorded with the consent of the
interviewees, fully transcribed, and analysed using a grounded theory approach.
Results All but one of the women had been offered counselling; one could not remember. Only two had accepted the offer of counselling, most feeling that it was unnecessary. The majority of these young women had decided that they wanted an abortion before accessing health services to request one. They had discussed their decision with someone close to them and did not feel the need to have further discussions with counsellors.
Conclusions Most young women have already made the decision to have an abortion before they approach their GP or a family planning clinic to request
one. At present, counselling is voluntary in the UK. Requiring women to undergo counselling would delay the process and for most women would be an unnecessary burden, whilst also diverting resources from those women
who require counselling.

Citation

Brown, S. (2013). Is counselling necessary? Making the decision to have an abortion. A qualitative interview study. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 18, 44-48. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2012.750290

Journal Article Type	Article
Publication Date	Feb 1, 2013
Deposit Date	Apr 20, 2016
Publicly Available Date	Apr 20, 2016
Print ISSN	1362-5187
Electronic ISSN	1473-0782
Publisher	Taylor and Francis
Peer Reviewed	Peer Reviewed
Volume	18
Pages	44-48
DOI	https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2012.750290
Keywords	Abortion; counselling; young women; qualitative;
Public URL	http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/9869
Publisher URL	http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2012.750290