Michelle Beattie
Development and preliminary psychometric properties of the Care Experience Feedback Improvement Tool (CEFIT)
Beattie, Michelle; Shepherd, Ashley; Lauder, William; Atherton, Iain; Cowie, Julie; Murphy, Douglas J
Authors
Ashley Shepherd
William Lauder
Prof Iain Atherton I.Atherton@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Julie Cowie
Douglas J Murphy
Abstract
Objective To develop a structurally valid and reliable, yet brief measure of patient experience of hospital quality of care, the Care Experience Feedback Improvement Tool (CEFIT). Also, to examine aspects of utility of CEFIT.
Background Measuring quality improvement at the clinical interface has become a necessary component of healthcare measurement and improvement plans, but the effectiveness of measuring such complexity is dependent on the purpose and utility of the instrument used.
Methods CEFIT was designed from a theoretical model, derived from the literature and a content validity index (CVI) procedure. A telephone population surveyed 802 eligible participants (healthcare experience within the previous 12 months) to complete CEFIT. Internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach's α. Principal component analysis was conducted to examine the factor structure and determine structural validity. Quality criteria were applied to judge aspects of utility.
Results CVI found a statistically significant proportion of agreement between patient and practitioner experts for CEFIT construction. 802 eligible participants answered the CEFIT questions. Cronbach's α coefficient for internal consistency indicated high reliability (0.78). Interitem (question) total correlations (0.28–0.73) were used to establish the final instrument. Principal component analysis identified one factor accounting for 57.3% variance. Quality critique rated CEFIT as fair for content validity, excellent for structural validity, good for cost, poor for acceptability and good for educational impact.
Conclusions CEFIT offers a brief yet structurally sound measure of patient experience of quality of care. The briefness of the 5-item instrument arguably offers high utility in practice. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of CEFIT to provide a robust basis for feedback to local clinical teams and drive quality improvement in the provision of care experience for patients. Further development of aspects of utility is also required.
Citation
Beattie, M., Shepherd, A., Lauder, W., Atherton, I., Cowie, J., & Murphy, D. J. (2016). Development and preliminary psychometric properties of the Care Experience Feedback Improvement Tool (CEFIT). BMJ Open, 6(6), Article e010101. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010101
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 26, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 14, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jun 14, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Jun 28, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 28, 2016 |
Electronic ISSN | 2044-6055 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 6 |
Issue | 6 |
Article Number | e010101 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010101 |
Keywords | CEFIT; development; measure; patient experience; |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/10367 |
Contract Date | Jun 28, 2016 |
Files
Development and preliminary psychometric properties of the Care Experience Feedback Improvement Tool (CEFIT)
(2.3 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
The occupational roles of nurses and midwives in the UK: an analysis of the Nursing and Midwifery Council-census England and Wales 2021 data linkage study
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Differences in prescribing and dispensing at end-of-life between people who died at home before and during the Covid-19 pandemic in Scotland.
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Applied Social Science for Nursing Students
(2023)
Book