Working Paper Series: Philosophy and Knowledge: Reflexion on a Flexible Management Method

Fascia, Michael

Abstract

In this discussion, we reflect on the value given to knowledge in a business context and deliberate a contrary philosophical perspective which does not conform to prevailing knowledge theory. We consider why, if knowledge is key for business success and competitive advantage, the transfer of knowledge within an organisation remains problematic. Whereby, if the creation of knowledge before transfer is recognised is a significant factor in determining a starting point for analogous scrutiny, then what makes this focal point so difficult to establish and measure? We therefore consider parallelism between agents who believe propositions and the formal system that derives proposition. In doing so, we synthesise from current literature and research, the epistemic principal of 'knowledge', which underpins the understanding of the many congruent knowledge transfer theories, in a business context. To do this we reflect on Lindström and the epistemic states of Spohn, wherein, we can draw on descriptions of conditional doxastic maps, as a natural extension of contemporary Kripke models. We conclude the epistemic principle of 'knowledge', which underpins the plausibility of comparisons between epistemically distinguishable knowledge transfer, must include perspectives and doyennes from a recognisable, not implied, value standpoint.

Citation

Fascia, M. (2019). Working Paper Series: Philosophy and Knowledge: Reflexion on a Flexible Management Method

• Working Paper Type: Working Paper
• Publication Date: Feb 18, 2019
• Deposit Date: Mar 22, 2019
• Publicly Available Date: Mar 26, 2019
• Publisher: SSRN
• Keywords: Knowledge, knowledge transfer
• Public URL: http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/1678466
• Publisher URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3337115
• Related Public URLs: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/38m2d
• Contract Date: Mar 22, 2019