Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance

France, Emma F.; Cunningham, Maggie; Ring, Nicola; Uny, Isabelle; Duncan, Edward A.S.; Jepson, Ruth G.; Maxwell, Margaret; Roberts, Rachel J.; Turley, Ruth L.; Booth, Andrew; Britten, Nicky; Flemming, Kate; Gallagher, Ian; Garside, Ruth; Hannes, Karin; Lewin, Simon; Noblit, George W.; Pope, Catherine; Thomas, James; Vanstone, Meredith; Higginbottom, Gina M. A.; Noyes, Jane

Authors

Emma F. France

Maggie Cunningham

Isabelle Uny

Edward A.S. Duncan

Ruth G. Jepson

Margaret Maxwell

Rachel J. Roberts

Ruth L. Turley

Andrew Booth

Nicky Britten

Kate Flemming

Ian Gallagher

Ruth Garside

Karin Hannes

Simon Lewin

George W. Noblit

Catherine Pope

James Thomas

Meredith Vanstone

Gina M. A. Higginbottom

Jane Noyes



Abstract

Aims
The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta?ethnography reporting.
Background
Evidence?based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people's experiences and associated social processes. Meta?ethnography is a rigorous seven?phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta?ethnography is used widely in health research, but reporting is often poor quality and this discourages trust in and use of its findings. Meta?ethnography reporting guidance is needed to improve reporting quality.
Design
The eMERGe study used a rigorous mixed?methods design and evidence?based methods to develop the novel reporting guidance and explanatory notes.
Methods
The study, conducted from 2015 to 2017, comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance for meta?ethnography conduct and reporting; (2) a review and audit of published meta?ethnographies to identify good practice principles; (3) international, multidisciplinary consensus?building processes to agree guidance content; (4) innovative development of the guidance and explanatory notes.
Findings
Recommendations and good practice for all seven phases of meta?ethnography conduct and reporting were newly identified leading to 19 reporting criteria and accompanying detailed guidance.
Conclusion
The bespoke eMERGe Reporting Guidance, which incorporates new methodological developments and advances the methodology, can help researchers to report the important aspects of meta?ethnography. Use of the guidance should raise reporting quality. Better reporting could make assessments of confidence in the findings more robust and increase use of meta?ethnography outputs to improve practice, policy, and service user outcomes in health and other fields. This is the first tailored reporting guideline for meta?ethnography. This article is being simultaneously published in the following journals: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Psycho?oncology, Review of Education, and BMC Medical Research Methodology

Citation

France, E. F., Cunningham, M., Ring, N., Uny, I., Duncan, E. A., Jepson, R. G., …Noyes, J. (2019). Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance. Psycho-Oncology, 28(3), 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4915

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jul 3, 2018
Online Publication Date Jan 15, 2019
Publication Date 2019-03
Deposit Date Jan 23, 2019
Publicly Available Date Jan 23, 2019
Journal Psycho-Oncology
Print ISSN 1057-9249
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 28
Issue 3
Pages 447-458
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4915
Keywords Guideline, meta?ethnography, nursing, publication standards, qualitative evidencesynthesis, qualitative research, reporting, research design
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/1526639

Files

Improving reporting of Meta-Ethnography: The eMERGe Reporting Guidance (497 Kb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‚ÄźNonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in anymedium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.© 2019 The Authors.Psycho‚ÄźOncologypublished by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.







Related Outputs



You might also like



Downloadable Citations

Whoops, looks like something went wrong.