Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Meanings and myths: Semiotics of Edinburgh Castle

Todd, Louise; Furger, Tanja

Authors

Tanja Furger



Abstract

Short abstract
We will present initial themes from my study into the semiotics of Edinburgh Castle through analysing shared online images. As a semiotic sign, Edinburgh Castle is an iconic tourist sight, a backdrop to the ‘festival city’, and the most popular paid-entry visitor attraction in Scotland.

Long abstract
In sightseeing the semiotic essence of any visitor attraction is the triadic relationship amongst a visitor to the attraction; the material sight of the attraction; and a marker or representation of the sight (MacCannell, 1976). The collection of buildings and artefacts that constitute Edinburgh Castle has sat upon the volcanic rock formation above Scotland’s capital for centuries and the site has been occupied by humans since the Bronze Age (Tabraham, 2003). The contemporary Edinburgh Castle visitor attraction is both a material ‘site’ and an iconic ‘sight’ (Berger, 2011). As a semiotic sign of tourism (MacCannell, 1976), it visually dominates Edinburgh’s skyline and separates the UNESCO World Heritage sites of the Old and New Towns that converge to form the city. The Castle provides a physical stage for the transformation of Edinburgh into the world’s leading ‘festival city’ (BOP Consulting & Festivals and Events International, 2015); and is the most popular paid-entry visitor attraction in Scotland, drawing more than 1.7 million visitors in 2017 (Historic Environment Scotland, 2017). Our research approach involves a semiotic study of meanings and myths (Barthes, 1993) within visual portrayals of Edinburgh Castle via the marker of ‘Instagram’ social media platform, as used by tourists and other stakeholders of Edinburgh as a destination. Our paper presents preliminary themes of the ways in which Edinburgh Castle is engaged with, consumed, and represented by tourists, as an iconic semiotic sign (Echtner, 1999). By reflecting upon these we contribute to the understanding of semiotic tourism practices (Ribeiro, 2009).

References

Barthes, R. (1993) Mythologies. Seuil.
Berger, A. A. (2011). Tourism as a postmodern semiotic activity. Semiotica, 2011(183), 105-119.
BOP Consulting & Festivals and Events International (2015). Thundering Hooves 2.0: A ten year strategy to sustain the success of Edinburgh’s Festivals, [Online], available at: http://www.edinburghfestivalcity.com/about/documents/196-thundering-hooves, accessed: 28/11/16.
Echtner, C. M. (1999). The semiotic paradigm: implications for tourism research. Tourism Management, 20, 47-57.
Historic Environment Scotland (2017). A record breaking 1.7 million visitors for Edinburgh Castle, available at: https://www.historicenvironment.scot/about-us/news/a-record-breaking-17-million-visitors-for-edinburgh-castle/
MacCannell, D. (1976). The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. Berkley: University of California Press.
Ribeiro, N. F. (2009). Tourism Representation and Semiotics – Directions for Future Research. Cogitur, Journal of Tourism Studies, 2(2), 7-14.
Tabraham, C. (Ed.). (2003). Edinburgh Castle: the official souvenir guide. Historic Scotland.

Citation

Todd, L., & Furger, T. (2018, May). Meanings and myths: Semiotics of Edinburgh Castle. Paper presented at Royal Anthropological Institute’s (RAI) Annual Conference: Art, Materiality and Representation, the Royal Anthropological Institute, The Department Of Africa, Oceania And The Americas Of The British Museum And The Department Of Anthropology At SOAS, London

Presentation Conference Type Conference Paper (unpublished)
Conference Name Royal Anthropological Institute’s (RAI) Annual Conference: Art, Materiality and Representation
Start Date May 31, 2018
End Date Jun 3, 2018
Deposit Date Apr 4, 2018
Keywords Edinburgh Castle, tourism, semiotics, sign, sight, marker
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/1142094