Do physical education teachers and general teachers differ in their implicit anti-fat bias?

Lau, P.W.C.; Leung, B.W.C; Pitkethly, A.J.; Ransdell, L.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine implicit attitudes of physical education (PE) and non-PE teachers towards overweight children stratified by gender, age, and body mass index. Two hundred school teachers (50% PE and 50% non-PE), aged 23-60 (mean=33.5 years) from Hong Kong, China, completed the validated implicit association test to measure attitudes towards overweight children. On the good-bad scale, there were no significant differences between scores for type of teacher. Younger teachers showed more weight discrimination against overweight students compared to their older counterparts. The interaction between type of teacher and gender was significant for the motivated-lazy score. Compared to PE teachers, non-PE teachers demonstrated less discrimination toward the overweight students on motivated-lazy score. Teachers demonstrated implicit weight discrimination toward overweight students. PE teachers are more prone to negative stereotypes related to motivation and laziness. The order of greatest overweight discrimination against overweight students was (1) male PE teachers, (2) female PE teachers, (3) non-PE female teachers and (4) non-PE male teachers.

Citation

Lau, P., Leung, B., Pitkethly, A., & Ransdell, L. (2018). Do physical education teachers and general teachers differ in their implicit anti-fat bias?. International Journal of Physical Education, 55(1), 27-37

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Mar 8, 2018
• Publication Date: Apr 30, 2018
• Deposit Date: Mar 26, 2018
• Publicly Available Date: Apr 30, 2018
• Journal: International Journal of Physical Education
• Print ISSN: 0341-8685
• Publisher: Meyer & Meyer Sport
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 55
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 27-37
• Keywords: body size discrimination; weight stigmatization, overweight children, fat discrimination
• Public URL: http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/1113109