Mark Shevlin
Testing the Use of “Clinical Checks” With the International Trauma Questionnaire to Measure PTSD and Complex PTSD
Shevlin, Mark; Hyland, Philip; Brewin, Chris R.; Cloitre, Marylene; Karatzias, Thanos; Redican, Enya
Authors
Philip Hyland
Chris R. Brewin
Marylene Cloitre
Prof Thanos Karatzias T.Karatzias@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Enya Redican
Abstract
Background: The International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) is the most widely used measure of ICD-11 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD). This self-report scale has been used to estimate prevalence rates of these disorders in general population and clinical samples but concerns abound that prevalence estimates derived from self-report measures are too high. To address this concern, we previously introduced the concept of adding ‘clinical checks’ to self-report measures to ensure initial responses reflected the intended clinical meaning of the scale item. Here we provide a rationale for adding clinical checks to the ITQ, describe the process of developing them, and demonstrate their effect at the symptom, cluster, and disorder levels in a general population sample.
Methods: A team of researchers and clinicians, including those who developed the ITQ, developed clinical checks for all ITQ items. These were tested using data from a non-probability quota-based representative sample of adults from the United Kingdom (N = 975).
Results: Use of clinical checks led to decreases in symptom endorsements ranging from 18.0% to 43.9%, and symptom cluster requirements from 19.1% to 35.9%. Disorder prevalence estimates without the clinical checks were 5.4% for PTSD and 9.5% for CPTSD. With the clinical checks, prevalence estimates dropped to 3.8% for PTSD (relative decrease = 29.6%) and 4.9% for CPTSD (relative decrease = 48.4%).
Conclusion: Clinical checks can be easily embedded into the ITQ and have a significant effect on prevalence estimates. We contextualise these results in relation to existing literature on population prevalence estimates derived from clinical interviews, and discrepancies between clinical interviews and self-report measures.
Citation
Shevlin, M., Hyland, P., Brewin, C. R., Cloitre, M., Karatzias, T., & Redican, E. (2025). Testing the Use of “Clinical Checks” With the International Trauma Questionnaire to Measure PTSD and Complex PTSD. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 152(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13799
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 1, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 23, 2025 |
Publication Date | 2025-07 |
Deposit Date | Mar 3, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 3, 2025 |
Journal | Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica |
Print ISSN | 0001-690X |
Electronic ISSN | 1600-0447 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 152 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 49-59 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13799 |
Keywords | CPTSD, diagnosis, ICD-11, PTSD |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/4163699 |
Files
Testing the use of ‘clinical checks’ with the International Trauma Questionnaire to measure PTSD and complex PTSD
(246 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Recovering from childhood sexual abuse: a theoretical framework for practice and research.
(2013)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search