The exercise of legal capacity, supported decision- making and Scotland’s mental health and incapacity legislation: working with CRPD challenges.

Stavert, Jill

Abstract

Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, particularly as interpreted in the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities General Comment No. 1, presents a significant challenge to all jurisdictions that equate interventions permitted under their mental health and incapacity laws with mental capacity. This is most notable in terms of the General Comment’s requirement that substitute decision-making regimes must be abolished. Notwithstanding this, it also offers the opportunity to revisit conceptions about the exercise of legal capacity and how this might be better supported and extended through supported decision-making. This article will offer some preliminary observations on this using Scottish mental health and incapacity legislation as an illustration although this may also have relevance to other jurisdictions.

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Competency and Capacity: Issues Affecting Health Law, Policy and Society)

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jun 9, 2015
• Online Publication Date: Jun 18, 2015
• Publication Date: Jun 18, 2015
• Deposit Date: Jul 7, 2017
• Publicly Available Date: Jul 7, 2017
• Journal: Laws
• Electronic ISSN: 2075-471X
• Publisher: MDPI
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 4
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 296-313
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws4020296
• Keywords: Article 12 CRPD; exercise of legal capacity; supported decision-making;will and preferences; human rights; Scottish legislation
• Public URL: http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/396356
• Contract Date: Jul 7, 2017