Karen Milton
A narrative review of global and national physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines development processes - The GUidelines Standards (GUS) project
Milton, Karen; Hanson, Coral; Pearsons, Alice; Chou, Roger; Stamatakis, Emmanuel
Authors
Dr Coral Hanson C.Hanson@napier.ac.uk
Senior Research Fellow
Miss Alice Pearsons A.Pearsons@napier.ac.uk
Research Fellow
Roger Chou
Emmanuel Stamatakis
Abstract
Background:
Clinical and public health guidelines serve to direct clinical practice and policy, based on the best available evidence. The World Health Organization (WHO) and national health bodies of many countries have released physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines. Despite significant overlap in the body of evidence reviewed, the guidelines differ across jurisdictions. This study aimed to review the processes used to develop global and national physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines and examine the extent to which they conform with a recommended methodological standard for the development of guidelines.
Methods:
We extracted data on nine sets of guidelines from seven jurisdictions (WHO, Australia, Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and United States). We rated each set of guidelines as high, medium, or low quality on criteria related to the rigour of the development process.
Results:
We observed variation in the quality of guidelines development processes across jurisdictions and across different criteria. Guidelines received the strongest overall ratings for criteria on clearly describing the evidence selected and stating an explicit link between the recommendations and the supporting evidence. Guidelines received the weakest overall ratings for criteria related to clearly describing the methods used to formulate the recommendations and reporting external review by experts prior to publication. Evaluated against the selected criteria, the strongest processes were undertaken by the WHO and Canada.
Conclusions:
Reaching agreement on acceptable guideline development processes, as well as the inclusion and appraisal procedures of different types of evidence, would help to strengthen and align future guidelines.
Citation
Milton, K., Hanson, C., Pearsons, A., Chou, R., & Stamatakis, E. (2024). A narrative review of global and national physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines development processes - The GUidelines Standards (GUS) project. Preventive Medicine, 183, Article 107959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107959
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 15, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 16, 2024 |
Publication Date | 2024-06 |
Deposit Date | Apr 18, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 18, 2024 |
Journal | Preventive Medicine |
Print ISSN | 0091-7435 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 183 |
Article Number | 107959 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107959 |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/3594349 |
Files
A narrative review of global and national physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines development processes - The GUidelines Standards (GUS) project
(522 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
What lifestyle management interventions are needed for atrial fibrillation?
(2022)
Journal Article
Justification, rationale and methodological approaches to realist reviews
(2022)
Journal Article
Managing stroke through COVID-19 and beyond
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search