Do UK survey licenses for otter support best practice?

White, Patrick; Findlay, Melanie

Abstract

Under the Habitats Regulations, resting/breeding places of otters (Lutra lutra) are protected from damage and disturbance, and ecologists are expected to identify such structures. Following an extensive programme of research, we now believe there is a more robust evidence base for what survey protocols are needed to identify such sites. In this article we (1) summarise some key aspects we believe represent evidence-based best practice for identification of otter resting and breeding sites, and (2) critically review the licensing conditions for otter surveys in the UK nations. Licensing for surveys with respect to otter holts varies between nations and in some cases could inhibit robust data collection, and thus we call for these to be reviewed. We also discuss the thorny issue of differing perceptions of disturbance, which inevitably accompanies our call for more intensive monitoring. We argue that there are potential repercussions resulting from suboptimal survey that outweigh any perceived disturbance from camera-trapping.

Citation

White, P., & Findlay, M. (2024). Do UK survey licenses for otter support best practice?. In Practice (CIEEM), 48-52

• Journal Article Type: Commentary
• Acceptance Date: Jan 16, 2024
• Online Publication Date: Mar 6, 2024
• Publication Date: 2024-03
• Deposit Date: Mar 14, 2024
• Publicly Available Date: Mar 7, 2026
• Journal: In Practice (CIEEM)
• Print ISSN: 1754-4883
• Publisher: Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Issue: 123
• Pages: 48-52
• Public URL: http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/3562572
• Publisher URL: https://cieem.net/i-am/in-practice/