Fiona E. Culhane
Structural and functional indices show similar performance in marine ecosystem quality assessment
Culhane, Fiona E.; Briers, Robert A.; Tett, Paul; Fernandes, Teresa F.
Abstract
Reliable ecosystem quality assessment of marine environments is increasingly important due to mounting pressures attributable to human activities. Biotic indices are widely used in studies to describe communities and indicate the ecological state of systems. This study focuses on benthic macroinvertebrate-based biotic indices for the assessment of ecosystem health. Indices used in ecosystem health assessment in the marine environment have mainly focussed on measuring structural components of the system while more recently the measurement of functional components has been highlighted. In this study the performance of traditional diversity indices based on structural components of benthic macroinvertebrate communities, indices developed for the EU Water Framework Directive, and indices which are based on functional biological traits of species were compared. The results indicated that while functional indices may provide a more detailed assessment of the benthic communities than structural indices, the overall outcome is broadly similar for both types of indices. This suggests measurement of functional indices may be unnecessary for routine monitoring purposes, although they may have value in revealing more specific aspects of change in a system. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
AB - Reliable ecosystem quality assessment of marine environments is increasingly important due to mounting pressures attributable to human activities. Biotic indices are widely used in studies to describe communities and indicate the ecological state of systems. This study focuses on benthic macroinvertebrate-based biotic indices for the assessment of ecosystem health. Indices used in ecosystem health assessment in the marine environment have mainly focussed on measuring structural components of the system while more recently the measurement of functional components has been highlighted. In this study the performance of traditional diversity indices based on structural components of benthic macroinvertebrate communities, indices developed for the EU Water Framework Directive, and indices which are based on functional biological traits of species were compared. The results indicated that while functional indices may provide a more detailed assessment of the benthic communities than structural indices, the overall outcome is broadly similar for both types of indices. This suggests measurement of functional indices may be unnecessary for routine monitoring purposes, although they may have value in revealing more specific aspects of change in a system.
Citation
Culhane, F. E., Briers, R. A., Tett, P., & Fernandes, T. F. (2014). Structural and functional indices show similar performance in marine ecosystem quality assessment. Ecological Indicators, 43, 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.03.009
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 12, 2014 |
Online Publication Date | Apr 11, 2014 |
Publication Date | 2014-08 |
Deposit Date | Aug 5, 2016 |
Journal | Ecological Indicators |
Print ISSN | 1470-160X |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 43 |
Pages | 271-280 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.03.009 |
Keywords | Biotic index; Benthic macroinvertebrate; Traits analysis; Functional indices; Structural indices |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/328695 |
You might also like
Making predictions of mangrove deforestation: a comparison of two methods in Kenya.
(2013)
Journal Article
Optimal Selection of a Connected Reserve Network.
(2006)
Journal Article
Incorporating spatial criteria into optimal reserve network selection.
(2002)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search