Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Practical Hardware for Evolvable Robots

Angus, Mike; Buchanan, Edgar; Le Goff, Léni K.; Hart, Emma; Eiben, Agoston; De Carlo, Matteo; Winfield, Alan F.; Hale, Matthew; Woolley, Robert; Timmis, Jonathan; Tyrrell, Andy M.

Authors

Mike Angus

Edgar Buchanan

Agoston Eiben

Matteo De Carlo

Alan F. Winfield

Matthew Hale

Robert Woolley

Jonathan Timmis

Andy M. Tyrrell



Abstract

The evolutionary robotics field offers the possibility of autonomously generating robots that are adapted to desired tasks by iteratively optimising across successive generations of robots with varying configurations until a high-performing candidate is found. The prohibitive time and cost of actually building this many robots means that most evolutionary robotics work is conducted in simulation, but to apply evolved robots to real-world problems, they must be implemented in hardware, which brings new challenges. This paper explores in detail the design of an example system for realising diverse evolved robot bodies, and specifically how this interacts with the evolutionary process. We discover that every aspect of the hardware implementation introduces constraints that change the evolutionary space, and exploring this interplay between hardware constraints and evolution is the key contribution of this paper. In simulation, any robot that can be defined by a suitable genetic representation can be implemented and evaluated, but in hardware, real-world limitations like manufacturing/assembly constraints and electrical power delivery mean that many of these robots cannot be built, or will malfunction in operation. This presents the novel challenge of how to constrain an evolutionary process within the space of evolvable phenotypes to only those regions that are practically feasible: the viable phenotype space. Methods of phenotype filtering and repair were introduced to address this, and found to degrade the diversity of the robot population and impede traversal of the exploration space. Furthermore, the degrees of freedom permitted by the hardware constraints were found to be poorly matched to the types of morphological variation that would be the most useful in the target environment. Consequently, the ability of the evolutionary process to generate robots with effective adaptations was greatly reduced. The conclusions from this are twofold. 1) Designing a hardware platform for evolving robots requires different thinking, in which all design decisions should be made with reference to their impact on the viable phenotype space. 2) It is insufficient to just evolve robots in simulation without detailed consideration of how they will be implemented in hardware, because the hardware constraints have a profound impact on the evolutionary space.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 7, 2023
Online Publication Date Aug 21, 2023
Publication Date 2023
Deposit Date Aug 9, 2023
Publicly Available Date Aug 21, 2023
Electronic ISSN 2296-9144
Publisher Frontiers Media
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 10
Article Number 1206055
DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1206055
Keywords Evolutionary Robotics, Hardware Design, Modular robots, Hardware constraints, Autonomous robot fabrication, Robot manufacturability
Publisher URL https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2023.1206055/abstract

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations