Prof Nicola Jane Roberts N.Roberts@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Respiratory trainees’ views about implementing e-learning into postgraduate training?
Roberts, Nicola Jane; Smith, Sue F.; Partridge, Martyn R.
Authors
Sue F. Smith
Martyn R. Partridge
Abstract
Background: We have previously shown good acceptance of e-learning by undergraduates but more guarded acceptance by those in the first 3–4 years after graduation. This study specifically investigates respiratory SpRs’ views about implementing e-learning into their postgraduate education.
Methods: Semi-structured telephone interviews with specialist respiratory registrars were undertaken to discuss their views about medical postgraduate training and e-learning. Calls were recorded and interviews transcribed and themed.
Results: 13 trainees took part (age 34±3 years; 11F, 2M). Ten (77%) were British medical school graduates and 6 (46%) graduated before 2000. All of the trainees stated that they had either minimal or no exposure to e-learning as undergraduates. All had internet access at home and 10 (77%) used the internet for educational purposes for 2–4 h per week. Three (23%) downloaded educational material to an iPod and 46% spent 2–4 h updating their knowledge per week. Nine (69%) thought that e-learning should be embedded into the training programme, although some suggested that initial piloting and training were required. Responses were varied (0–50%) when asked how many training days could be replaced by e-learning. Maintaining the social interaction of training days was emphasised, and need to use the full teaching day without gaps was highlighted. The ideal length of an e-module was thought to be <2 h (54%). Five (38.5%) suggested 2–4 h, but dependent on the topic and whether users could interrupt the module without loss. Nine (69%) thought that e-modules should be a compulsory component of postgraduate certification and, if this was put in place, 12 (92%) would complete the modules at home. Lack of free uninterrupted study time made e-learning difficult to complete at work. Specific diseases, bronchoscopic anatomy, physiology, lung function, radiology and interpretation of results were suggested as areas which would lend themselves to delivery via e-learning.
Conclusions: Overall, postgraduates seem receptive to the positive benefits of using e-learning as part of their postgraduate training. However, the social interaction and face-to-face teaching on study days were highlighted as important. Most were willing to undertake e-learning in their own time, but as an adjunct rather than a replacement for training days.
Citation
Roberts, N. J., Smith, S. F., & Partridge, M. R. Respiratory trainees’ views about implementing e-learning into postgraduate training?. Presented at British Thoracic Society winter meeting, London
Presentation Conference Type | Conference Abstract |
---|---|
Conference Name | British Thoracic Society winter meeting |
Online Publication Date | Dec 1, 2009 |
Publication Date | 2009-12 |
Deposit Date | Aug 3, 2023 |
Print ISSN | 0040-6376 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 65 |
Issue | suppl 4 |
Pages | A159-A166 |
Publisher URL | https://thorax.bmj.com/content/64/Suppl_4/A159 |
You might also like
The Academic Respiratory Research Alliance network
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
The “what, why, and how?” of story completion in health services research: a scoping review
(2024)
Journal Article
What do pulmonary rehabilitation participants want their educational sessions to comprise of? Exploring a participant-centered approach to designing pulmonary rehabilitation education
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Are nurses proactive about minimising their exposure to second hand tobacco smoke (SHS)
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Does health literacy in respiratory patients impact on their rating of important topics for education in pulmonary rehabilitation?
(2024)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search