Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Unity in diversity? When advocacy coalitions and policy beliefs grow trees in South Africa

Malkam�ki, Arttu; Yl�-Anttila, Tuomas; Brockhaus, Maria; Toppinen, Anne; Wagner, Paul M.

Authors

Arttu Malkam�ki

Tuomas Yl�-Anttila

Maria Brockhaus

Anne Toppinen



Abstract

Competing coalitions can stabilise policymaking and hinder policy changes that are required to address the mounting pressures on land use systems across the globe. Thus, understanding the driving forces of coalition formation is important. This paper builds on the Advocacy Coalition Framework to determine the relative contributions of two sets of beliefs (more general policy core beliefs and more specific beliefs concerning policy instruments) to coalition formation in South African tree plantation politics and to identify coalitions therein. Discourse Network Analysis was used to code 656 statements regarding 40 beliefs to create network data from 55 interviews with organisational elites. Results from a network analysis of the twelve most salient beliefs indicate that dissimilar policy core beliefs about the validity of environmental regulation, social costs of tree plantations, and the conditionality of land reform in South Africa divide actors into two coalitions: the hegemonic “business-as-usual” coalition and the minority “justice and change” coalition. These boundaries were confirmed by comparing the network based on shared policy core beliefs with a co-ordination network. Dissimilar beliefs concerning policy instruments, including eco-certification and an indicative zoning, also divide actors, yet actors’ reasoning for or against these instruments differ to the degree that united fronts are unlikely to form. Hegemonic coalitions that combine selected state and business interests with labour arguments and prioritise short-term economic efficiency threaten to delay the necessary changes away from business-as-usual across land use systems in South Africa and beyond.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 8, 2021
Online Publication Date Jan 22, 2021
Publication Date 2021-03
Deposit Date Sep 26, 2022
Publicly Available Date Sep 27, 2022
Journal Land Use Policy
Print ISSN 0264-8377
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 102
Article Number 105283
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105283
Keywords Advocacy coalition framework, Belief systems, Community detection, Discourse network analysis, Industrial tree plantations, Forest landscape restoration
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2924160

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations