Susan F. Smith
Comparison of a web-based package with tutor-based methods of teaching respiratory medicine: subjective and objective evaluations
Smith, Susan F.; Roberts, Nicola J.; Partridge, Martyn R.
Dr Nicola Jane Roberts N.Roberts@napier.ac.uk
Martyn R. Partridge
Respiratory disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality not only in the United Kingdom, but globally. A good understanding of respiratory disease and its treatment is essential for all medical graduates. As a result of changes in clinical practice, patients with some common respiratory illnesses are less often admitted to hospital, restricting the experience available to undergraduate students. Combined with a potential shortage of clinical teachers, this means that new methods of teaching need to be developed and appraised. The aim of this study was to establish whether a web-based package on the diagnosis of respiratory disease would be as effective and as acceptable to final year medical students as tutor-led methods of teaching the same material.
137 out of 315 final year undergraduate students in a single medical school volunteered to take part. Each received up to two hours of tutor-lead interactive, tutor-lead didactic or electronic, Web-based teaching on the accurate diagnosis and management of respiratory disease. Post teaching performance was assessed by multiple true/false questions and data interpretation exercises, whilst students' teaching preferences were assessed by questionnaire.
Despite a high knowledge baseline before the study, there was a small, but statistically significant increase in knowledge score after all forms of teaching. Similarly, data interpretation skills improved in all groups, irrespective of teaching format, Although paradoxically most students expressed a preference for interactive tutor-lead teaching, spirometry interpretation in those receiving web-based teaching improved significantly more [p = 0.041] than in those in the interactive group.
Web-based teaching is at least as good as other teaching formats, but we need to overcome students' reluctance to engage with this teaching method.
Smith, S. F., Roberts, N. J., & Partridge, M. R. (2007). Comparison of a web-based package with tutor-based methods of teaching respiratory medicine: subjective and objective evaluations. BMC Medical Education, 7(1), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-7-41
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Nov 1, 2007|
|Online Publication Date||Nov 1, 2007|
|Deposit Date||Aug 30, 2022|
|Publicly Available Date||Sep 1, 2022|
|Journal||BMC Medical Education|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
Comparison Of A Web-based Package With Tutor-based Methods Of Teaching Respiratory Medicine: Subjective And Objective Evaluations
Publisher Licence URL
You might also like
Delivering asthma reviews during the Covid-19 pandemic
Self-management in chronic lung disease: what is missing?