Sarkis Manoukian
Probabilistic microsimulation to examine the cost-effectiveness of hospital admission screening strategies for carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in the United Kingdom
Manoukian, Sarkis; Stewart, Sally; Dancer, Stephanie J.; Mason, Helen; Graves, Nicholas; Robertson, Chris; Leonard, Alistair; Kennedy, Sharon; Kavanagh, Kim; Parcell, Benjamin; Reilly, Jacqui
Authors
Sally Stewart
Prof Stephanie Dancer S.Dancer@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Helen Mason
Nicholas Graves
Chris Robertson
Alistair Leonard
Sharon Kennedy
Kim Kavanagh
Benjamin Parcell
Jacqui Reilly
Abstract
Background
Antimicrobial resistance has been recognised as a global threat with carbapenemase- producing-Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) as a prime example. CPE has similarities to COVID-19 where asymptomatic patients may be colonised representing a source for onward transmission. There are limited treatment options for CPE infection leading to poor outcomes and increased costs. Admission screening can prevent cross-transmission by pre-emptively isolating colonised patients.
Objective
We assess the relative cost-effectiveness of screening programmes compared with no- screening.
Methods
A microsimulation parameterised with NHS Scotland date was used to model scenarios of the prevalence of CPE colonised patients on admission. Screening strategies were (a) two-step screening involving a clinical risk assessment (CRA) checklist followed by microbiological testing of high-risk patients; and (b) universal screening. Strategies were considered with either culture or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. All costs were reported in 2019 UK pounds with a healthcare system perspective.
Results
In the low prevalence scenario, no screening had the highest probability of cost-effectiveness. Among screening strategies, the two CRA screening options were the most likely to be cost-effective. Screening was more likely to be cost-effective than no screening in the prevalence of 1 CPE colonised in 500 admitted patients or more. There was substantial uncertainty with the probabilities rarely exceeding 40% and similar results between strategies. Screening reduced non-isolated bed-days and CPE colonisation. The cost of screening was low in relation to total costs.
Conclusion
The specificity of the CRA checklist was the parameter with the highest impact on the cost-effectiveness. Further primary data collection is needed to build models with less uncertainty in the parameters.
Citation
Manoukian, S., Stewart, S., Dancer, S. J., Mason, H., Graves, N., Robertson, C., Leonard, A., Kennedy, S., Kavanagh, K., Parcell, B., & Reilly, J. (2022). Probabilistic microsimulation to examine the cost-effectiveness of hospital admission screening strategies for carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Health Economics, 23(7), 1173-1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01419-5
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Nov 29, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 21, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2022-09 |
Deposit Date | Jan 7, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 7, 2022 |
Journal | The European Journal of Health Economics |
Print ISSN | 1618-7598 |
Electronic ISSN | 1618-7601 |
Publisher | Springer |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 23 |
Issue | 7 |
Pages | 1173-1185 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01419-5 |
Keywords | Health Economics, Screening programmes, Healthcare-associated infection, Carbapenemase-producing-Enterobacteriaceae, Microsimulation, National Health Service |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2832797 |
Files
Probabilistic microsimulation to examine the cost-effectiveness of hospital admission screening strategies for carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in the United Kingdom
(914 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Dos and don’ts for hospital cleaning
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search