Adam Field
The Use of Recovery Strategies in Professional Soccer: A Worldwide Survey
Field, Adam; Harper, Liam D.; Chrismas, Bryna C.R.; Fowler, Peter M.; McCall, Alan; Paul, Darren J.; Chamari, Karim; Taylor, Lee
Authors
Liam D. Harper
Bryna C.R. Chrismas
Peter M. Fowler
Dr Alan McCall A.McCall@napier.ac.uk
Research Fellow
Darren J. Paul
Karim Chamari
Lee Taylor
Abstract
Purpose: To survey soccer practitioners’ recovery strategy: (1) use, (2) perceived effectiveness, and (3) factors influencing their implementation in professional soccer. Methods: A cross-sectional convenience sample of professional soccer club/confederation practitioners completed a web-based survey (April to July 2020). Pearson chi-square and Fisher exact tests with Cramer V (φ − c) assessed relationships and their strength, respectively, between the perceived effectiveness and frequency of strategy use. Results: A total of 80 soccer practitioners (13 countries) completed the survey. The 3 most important recovery objectives were “alleviating muscle damage/fatigue,” “minimizing injury risk,” and “performance optimization.” The most frequently used strategies were active recovery, structured recovery day, extra rest day, massage, cold-water therapy, and carbohydrate provision (predominantly on match day and match day + 1). Relationships were identified between perceived effectiveness and frequency of strategy use for sleep medication (P < .001, φ − c = 0.48), carbohydrate provision (P = .007, φ − c = 0.60), protein provision (P = .007, φ − c = 0.63), an extra rest day (P < .001, φ − c = 0.56), and a structured recovery day (P = .049, φ − c = 0.50). Conclusions: The study demonstrates that professional soccer practitioners have a range of objectives geared toward enhancing player recovery. A disconnect is apparent between the perceived effectiveness of many recovery strategies and their frequency of use in an applied setting. Novel data indicate that strategies are most frequently employed around match day. Challenges to strategy adoption are mainly competing disciplinary interests and resource limitations. Researchers and practitioners should liaise to ensure that the complexities involved with operating in an applied environment are elucidated and apposite study designs are adopted, in turn, facilitating the use of practically effective and compatible recovery modalities.
Citation
Field, A., Harper, L. D., Chrismas, B. C., Fowler, P. M., McCall, A., Paul, D. J., Chamari, K., & Taylor, L. (2021). The Use of Recovery Strategies in Professional Soccer: A Worldwide Survey. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 16(12), 1804-1815. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0799
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | May 29, 2021 |
Publication Date | Dec 1, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Dec 16, 2021 |
Journal | International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance |
Print ISSN | 1555-0265 |
Electronic ISSN | 1555-0273 |
Publisher | Human Kinetics |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 16 |
Issue | 12 |
Pages | 1804-1815 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0799 |
Keywords | football; practitioner; coach; applied practice; qualitative research |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2830180 |
You might also like
Research in football: evolving and lessons we can learn from our mistakes
(2021)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search