Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Complexity and specificity of experimentally-induced expectations in motion perception

Gekas, Nikos; Chalk, Matthew; Seitz, Aaron; Series, Peggy

Authors

Matthew Chalk

Aaron Seitz

Peggy Series



Abstract

Abstract Our perceptions are fundamentally altered by our expectations, i.e., priors about the world. In previous statistical learning experiments (Chalk, Seitz, & Seriès, 2010), we investigated how such priors are formed by presenting subjects with white low contrast moving dots on a blank screen and using a bimodal distribution of motion directions such that two directions were more frequently presented than the others. We found that human observers quickly and automatically developed expectations for the most frequently presented directions of motion. Here, we examine the specificity of these expectations. Can one learn simultaneously to expect different motion directions for dots of different colors? We interleaved moving dot displays of two different colors, either red or green, with different motion direction distributions. When one distribution was bimodal while the other was uniform, we found that subjects learned a single bimodal prior for the two stimuli. On the contrary, when both distributions were similarly structured, we found evidence for the formation of two distinct priors, which significantly influenced the subjects' behavior when no stimulus was presented. Our results can be modeled using a Bayesian framework and discussed in terms of a suboptimality of the statistical learning process under some conditions.

Citation

Gekas, N., Chalk, M., Seitz, A., & Series, P. (2013). Complexity and specificity of experimentally-induced expectations in motion perception. Journal of Vision, 13(4), https://doi.org/10.1167/13.4.8

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Mar 13, 2013
Publication Date 2013-03
Deposit Date Dec 7, 2021
Journal Journal of Vision
Publisher Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 13
Issue 4
Article Number 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1167/13.4.8
Public URL http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2827331