Dana Khartabil
Design and Evaluation of Visualisation Techniques to Facilitate Argument Exploration
Khartabil, Dana; Collins, Christopher; Wells, Simon; Bach, Benjamin; Kennedy, Jessie
Authors
Christopher Collins
Dr Simon Wells S.Wells@napier.ac.uk
Lecturer
Benjamin Bach
Prof Jessie Kennedy J.Kennedy@napier.ac.uk
Emeritus Professor
Abstract
This paper reports the design and comparison of three visualizations to represent the structure and content within arguments. Arguments are artefacts of reasoning widely used across domains such as education, policy making, and science. An argument is made up of sequences of statements (premises) which can support or contradict each other, individually or in groups through Boolean operators. Understanding the resulting hierarchical structure of arguments while being able to read the arguments’ text poses problems related to overview, detail, and navigation. Based on interviews with argument analysts we iteratively
designed three techniques, each using combinations of tree visualizations (sunburst, icicle), content display (in-situ, tooltip) and interactive navigation. Structured discussions with the analysts show benefits of each these techniques; e.g., sunburst being good in presenting overview but showing arguments in-situ is better than pop-ups. A controlled user study with 21 participants and three tasks shows complementary evidence suggesting that a sunburst with pop-up for the content is the best trade-off solution. Our results can inform visualizations within existing argument visualization tools and increase the visibility of ‘novel and effective’ visualizations in the argument visualization community.
Citation
Khartabil, D., Collins, C., Wells, S., Bach, B., & Kennedy, J. (2021). Design and Evaluation of Visualisation Techniques to Facilitate Argument Exploration. Computer Graphics Forum, 40(6), 447-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14389
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 28, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 9, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2021-09 |
Deposit Date | Jul 16, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 10, 2022 |
Print ISSN | 0167-7055 |
Electronic ISSN | 1467-8659 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 40 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 447-465 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14389 |
Keywords | interaction, visualization, Text visualisation, Hybrid visualisation techniques |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2787624 |
Files
Design And Evaluation Of Visualisation Techniques To Facilitate Argument Exploration (accepted version)
(21.5 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
Thou Shalt Not Squander Life – Comparing Five Approaches to Argument Strength
(2023)
Journal Article
Burdens of Proposing: On the Burden of Proof in Deliberation Dialogues
(2022)
Journal Article
The Open Argumentation PLatform (OAPL)
(2020)
Book Chapter
Information Diffusion in Multi-Agent Communities
(2017)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Ontology Based Business Simulations
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search