James Richards
Organising to beat the Trade Union Act (2016) voting thresholds: a case study of organising and tactics from the University and College Union
Richards, James; Ellis, Vaughan
Abstract
Purpose
A retrospective action-research case study of one branch of the University and College Union (UCU) is used to show how threshold requirements of the Act can be systematically beaten.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper responds to calls for “best practice” on how trade unions may react to member voting threshold requirements of the Trade Union Act 2016 (the Act). A broader aim is to make a theoretical contribution related to trade union organising and tactics in “get the vote out” (GTVO) industrial action organising campaigns.
Findings
Findings are presented as a lead organiser's first-hand account of a successful GTVO campaign contextualised in relation to theories of organising. The findings offer “best practice” for union organisers required to beat the Act's voting thresholds and also contribute to theories surrounding trade union organising tactics.
Research limitations/implications
Further development and adaptation of the proposed model may be required when applied to larger bargaining units and different organising contexts.
Practical implications
The findings can inform the organising practices/tactics of trade unions in relation to statutory ballots. The findings also allow Human Resource (HR) practitioners to reflect on their approach to dealing with unions capable of mounting successful GTVO campaigns.
Social implications
The findings have the potential to collectively empower workers, via their trade unions, to defend and further their interests in a post-financial crisis context and in the shadow of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Originality/value
This is the first known empirical account of organising to exceed voting thresholds of the Act, providing practical steps for union organisers in planning for statutory ballots. Further value lies in the paper's use of a novel first-hand account of a GTVO campaign, offering a new and first, theoretical model of organising tactics to beat the Act.
Citation
Richards, J., & Ellis, V. (2022). Organising to beat the Trade Union Act (2016) voting thresholds: a case study of organising and tactics from the University and College Union. Personnel Review, 51(9), 2294-2311. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2020-0756
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Aug 18, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 14, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2022 |
Deposit Date | Sep 21, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 21, 2021 |
Journal | Personnel Review |
Print ISSN | 0048-3486 |
Publisher | Emerald |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 51 |
Issue | 9 |
Pages | 2294-2311 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2020-0756 |
Keywords | Trade Union Act 2016, Case study, UCU, Organising, Tactics, Collective bargaining |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2780057 |
Files
Organising To Beat The Trade Union Act 2016’s Voting Thresholds: A Case Study Of Organising And Tactics From The University And College Union (accepted version)
(297 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Strategies for success? Market entry strategies of new craft beer producers
(2021)
Book Chapter
“Brilliant at everything, saying yes to even more”: The realities of overwork in academia
(2021)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
‘Organising from home’: Beating the Trade Union Act 2016 in a global pandemic/recession
(2021)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search