Lee J. Curley
Verdict spotting: Investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors, and verdict system in jurors
Curley, Lee J.; Murray, Jennifer; MacLean, Rory; Munro, James; Lages, Martin; Frumkin, Lara A.; Laybourn, Phyllis; Brown, David
Authors
Dr Jennifer Murray J.Murray2@napier.ac.uk
Associate Professor
Dr Rory MacLean r.maclean@napier.ac.uk
Lecturer
James Munro
Martin Lages
Lara A. Frumkin
Phyllis Laybourn
David Brown
Abstract
The Scottish verdict of not proven represents a second acquittal verdict which is not legally defined. Existing research into the influence of the not proven verdict on jury decision making is modest. The main aim of the current study was therefore to investigate the influence of verdict systems (two vs three) on juror decision making. The effect of pre-trial bias and evidence anchors on juror judgements were also examined. One-hundred and twenty-eight mock jurors listened to two homicide vignettes and were asked to rate their belief of guilt of the accused and to give a verdict in both trials. The results suggest that pre-trial bias was a significant predictor of both verdict choice and belief of guilt, whereas evidence anchors were not a significant predictor of either. Finally, both guilty and not guilty verdicts were given with increased frequency in the two-verdict system when compared to the three-verdict system.
Citation
Curley, L. J., Murray, J., MacLean, R., Munro, J., Lages, M., Frumkin, L. A., Laybourn, P., & Brown, D. (2022). Verdict spotting: Investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors, and verdict system in jurors. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 29(3), 323-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1904450
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 7, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | May 4, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2022 |
Deposit Date | Mar 9, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | May 5, 2022 |
Print ISSN | 1321-8719 |
Electronic ISSN | 1934-1687 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 29 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 323-344 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1904450 |
Keywords | Not proven verdict; Anchoring and adjustment; Pre-trial biases; Decision science; Juror decision-making; verdict systems; heuristics |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2751302 |
Files
Verdictspotting: Investigating The Effects Of Juror Bias, Evidence Anchors, And Verdict System In Jurors (accepted version)
(516 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Gendering Narcissism: Different Roots and Different Routes to Intimate Partner Violence
(2024)
Journal Article
Clinician perception of pathological narcissism in females: a vignette-based study
(2023)
Journal Article
Female Narcissism: Assessment, Aetiology, and Behavioural Manifestations
(2021)
Journal Article
Assessing cognitive bias in forensic decisions: A review and outlook
(2019)
Journal Article
Positive changes and appreciation of life among economic immigrants in Scotland.
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search