Prof Sam Illingworth S.Illingworth@napier.ac.uk
Professor
Are scientific abstracts written in poetic verse an effective representation of the underlying research? [Version 3]
Illingworth, Sam
Authors
Abstract
The central purpose of science is to explain (Purtill, 1970). However, who is that explanation for, and how is this explanation communicated once it has been deduced?
Scientific research is typically communicated via papers in journals, with an abstract presented as a summary of that explanation. However, in many instances they may be written in a manner which is non-communicatory to a lay reader (Halliday & Martin, 2003). This study begins to investigate if poetry could be used as an alternative form of communication, by first assessing if poetic verse is an effective form of communication to other scientists. In order to assess this suitability, a survey was conducted in which two different groups of participants were asked questions based on a scientific abstract. One group of participants was given the original scientific abstract, whilst the second group was instead given a poem written about the scientific study. Quantitative analysis found that whilst a scientific audience found a poetic interpretation of a scientific abstract to be no less interesting or inspiring than the original prose, they did find it to be less accessible. However, further qualitative analysis suggested that the poem did a good job in conveying a similar meaning to that presented in the original abstract. The results of this study indicate that whilst for a scientific audience poetry should not replace the prose abstract, it could be used alongside the original format to inspire the reader to find out more about the topic. Further research is needed to investigate the effectiveness of this approach for a non-expert audience.
Alternative version:
Are scientific papers understood,
By anyone from outside of the field;
And is an abstract really any good,
If jargon means its secrets aren’t revealed?
Could poetry present a different way,
Of summing up research in a nutshell;
Presented in a language for the lay,
Yet still useful for scientists as well?
This study aimed to find if it was true,
That poems could be a way to convey fact;
By splitting sample researchers in two:
And giving each a different abstract.
The findings showed that whilst prose was preferred,
Related meanings from both were inferred.
Citation
Illingworth, S. (2016). Are scientific abstracts written in poetic verse an effective representation of the underlying research? [Version 3]. F1000Research, 5, Article 91. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7783.3
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 21, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Aug 25, 2016 |
Publication Date | 2016 |
Deposit Date | Feb 15, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 18, 2021 |
Journal | F1000Research |
Electronic ISSN | 2046-1402 |
Publisher | F1000Research |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 5 |
Article Number | 91 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7783.3 |
Keywords | Science Communication, Interdisciplinary, Communication, Publishing |
Public URL | http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/Output/2736671 |
Files
Are Scientific Abstracts Written In Poetic Verse An Effective Representation Of The Underlying Research? [Version 3]
(1.6 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
© 2016 Illingworth S. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You might also like
A collaborative adaptation game for promoting climate action: Minions of Disruptions™
(2024)
Journal Article
Poetry and Pedagogy in Higher Education
(2024)
Book
Why role-playing games can spur climate action
(2024)
Journal Article
Generative AI in academia: Friend or foe?
(2024)
Digital Artefact
Downloadable Citations
About Edinburgh Napier Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@napier.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search